Extended World Affairs 2011 Discussions

Hello World:
Everyone knows the position I have taken, regarding Libya and Gaddafi with the recent 7-part series on that, as I felt led by God. I still believe that Gaddafi is in the right, and the International Community/ U.N. or NATO, with the United States are wrong. Just recently, I heard and read reports that Gaddafi or Qadhafi had offered for the Libyan people to hold elections for a leader, and he agreed that if he lost that election, he would step down.

I find that offer by Gaddafi quite interesting. There are all these rebel groups and the I.C./NATO talking about democracy, but Gaddafi is the only one willing to act in support of that democracy. Yet, they want to kill him. Gaddafi has at several times offered a cease fire and compromise to the rebels and to NATO. He wrote the United States government a letter, trying to stop the killing from BOTH sides, but nobody wants to hear him. All sides have rejected absolutely everything Gaddafi has offered.

People need to realize whether you see Gaddafi as being legitimate or not, he is the ESTABLISHED leader of Libya, and has been for over 40 years. Now, he is saying okay, look, let everybody vote, and I am willing to give up my power and step down if I lose the vote of the people of Libya. In other words, Gaddafi is saying PROVE TO THE WORLD that the Libyan people really want me out of power, by having a legitimate vote.

Gaddafi is challenging the rebels and NATO and HILLARY CLINTON and saying allright you all and Hillary, lets REALLY see what the people want, and not the lies you all and the western media and the International Criminal Court are spreading about rape and genocide. LETS SEE THE TRUTH IN ACTION ABOUT HOW THE LIBYAN PEOPLE REALLY FEEL ABOUT ME AND VOTE. My question to everybody is what happens if Libyans do vote and Gaddafi wins??? ARE YOU REBELS AND U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY SCARED that if there is a vote in Libya that Gaddafi could actually win over all other challengers?

None of the rebels and none of the international power players who are against or who disagree with Gaddafi has had any sense to try and talk to Gaddafi. Somebody, including the I.C. and Hillary should have called for direct talks with Gaddafi as soon as the rebel uprising started. Also, many government and military defectors from Gaddafi defected not because it was the right thing to do, but because Gaddafi is not strong enough militarily to stand up to the U.S. and NATO.

I believe that if Gaddafi had some real military power to kick the U.S. and NATO's butt, those Libyan government officials and military personnel would not have defected to the other side. I do NOT think Gaddafi should be threatening to strike European countries either. I also do NOT think he really has anything much to strike Europe with or to do any serious damage.

He might have a dangerous surprise; but you mean to tell me, with his country, his life, his family, and his leadership on the line, he has been holding back some serious military hardware? According to several media reports, some time back, in the middle of the uprising, when NATO/I.C. started bombing Libya, that even Gaddafi's "voluptuous" Ukrainian nurse left him and fled out of Libya back to her home in Europe.

I thought that was funny, not to take away from the seriousness of the situation; but that the media described Gaddafi's nurse as voluptuous. You know that has got to hurt, when your voluptuous nurse leaves you. I wish I had a voluptuous nurse. Remember back in my archives, where I talked about couples,
and husband and wives.

I said the wife has to be prepared to play more than one role than just house wife, and it could be between at LEAST 3 to 5 different roles, and maybe even more? Well, a nurse could be one of those roles. Not a real life nurse, but role playing as in looking, dressing and acting the part to spice up the marriage, as a means to prevent cheating.

I heard reports that a lot of women like Gaddafi. I actually had one woman tell me, she liked him when he was younger. He supposedly treats women well. The only thing that confuses me is all the women who go out to train and become his bodyguards. He had a fine woman dive in front of him, take a bullet and die to save his life. They wear lipstick and high heels. I MEAN COME ON MAN! You can not have the fine women going into harms way getting killed. That just should not be.

Women, IN GENERAL OR OVERALL, should be careful of going into harms way in combat, security and war against men. I have seen some fine police officers, but I disagree with that. This is just my opinion in regards to not agreeing with women or fine women fighting in combat. Women SHOULD NOT fight in combat or war or be in harms way, unless they absolutely have to; or in other words, unless there were a severe shortage of men in their population.

I could not be married to a female police officer, who is out serving in the streets in harms way. I could not accept something bad or gruesome happening to her body or face, or her getting killed because of her profession. If you are fine or very attractive, keep your femininity and do something else, or find a different and safer line of work, PLEASE.

I want my woman to be fine and sexy looking, NOT beat-up, banged and boomed, hard-looking or winding up dead. There is a song called, "Love Is A Battlefield"; but the kind of battlefield that those female security guards for Gaddafi get involved with is NOT for love, but can be deadly; and also NOT a place for lipstick and high heels.

Again, going back to what I was mentioning above, about Gaddafi threatening to strike parts of Europe; if Gaddafi has some real firepower to strike a country across the Mediterranean sea, then lets see it. Again, he can not even put a dent into any of the NATO warships sitting in that sea, almost near Libya's shoreline.

At this point, with all of the damage that has been caused from human lives and infrastructure in Libya, if I was Gaddafi I would step down and go to a friendly country. Although as the Libyan conflict has dragged along, Gaddafi was gaining some momentum of support in Libya. There were hundreds of thousands of people in Tripoli who rallied to Gaddafi's support.

Another thing, the I.C./U.N./NATO/U.S./HILLARY CLINTON could possibly have made a very big time mistake in attacking Gaddafi and bombing Libya, because Gaddafi was popular in the African Union; and it is believed in some reports, that if the I.C/U.N./NATO/U.S. had not attacked and bombed Gaddafi and his country, he would have been able to help significantly in the Somalia crisis. Gaddafi was a stabilizing force in Africa, and it is further believed that the I.C./etc.etc, has messed up North and Eastern Africa when they attacked Gaddafi.

It seems that the I.C./ NATO/U.S. failure to kill Gaddafi quickly or with a quick strike is starting to backfire, even if Gaddafi loses complete power over Libya soon, because of the increased problems in Africa, like the Somalia situation I mentioned above. The I.C./ NATO continues to be confused and the U.S. has gone quiet about the situation. There was infighting among the rebels, but now they are going into the capital of Tripoli fighting against Gaddafi's forces, and Gaddafi has not been seen.

I also want to put in something about Syria and Sudan. The Syrian government headed by Bashar Al-Assad, is NOT the nicest government around; and it has been reported, that Assad has been strict against Christians, and he has closed down several Christian churches in Syria.

There is footage of the Syrian government's crackdown, in neighborhoods, on the rebels; killing people who have rebelled. It is a bad situation, however what was not reported, is at the beginning of the rebellion in Syria, the rebels took up firearms and fired on Syrian police and military. So, now, the Syrian government under Assad, has decided to decisively exterminate and purge his country from the rebels.

The thing is that as I mentioned back during the Libya-Gaddafi series, many of these protest in these countries were started by the protesting rebels being violent. The thing, with such violent approaches started by the rebels, whether they are right or wrong in what they believe, is that there are greater consequences and greater risks for people to be hurt and killed, than if those rebels started with a more diplomatic approach.

In mentioning quickly about Sudan, members of the former government that caused the genocide in Darfur, between 2003 and 2010, has come back and is using brutal torture methods such as genital crushing and fingernail pulling and other harsh torture on Christians, and are killing Christians in Sudan again. I want to come back and discuss Iran.