Another Installment On Israel Not Excused

Hello World:
I am really trying to conclude this recent subject on Israel, but I had to split the last post to make this one; because that last post was eight pages long. So, I really do not want individual posts to be that long. Ideally, I would prefer to have posts at around two to three pages in length.

Last time I was finishing up talking about Spiritual Israel. One of the last sentences I said from the previous post was that Spiritual Israel consist of both present day natural Jews and Gentles who have, SPECIFICALLY under God's new covenant, accepted Jesus. These present day Jews are considered to be called Messianic Jews. In a moment I will go into how Jews and Gentiles goes from natural to spiritual.

This Spiritual Israel also consist of Jews of the Old Testament who had faith in the promise. This Spiritual Israel of born again Jews and Gentiles takes precedent over modern day natural Israel, who deny Jesus Christ, the Son, altogether.

That group is called Spiritual Israel, because they are born again spiritually, and to worship and serve God, a person or people has to do it in their spirit. Like Jesus said, God is a Spirit, and we must worship Him in Spirit and in truth.

To elaborate further on being born again spiritually, to sincerely worship and serve God and be in the kingdom of God IN ETERNITY, a man has to be spiritually born again. So, this is not a natural and temporary situation. Under the Old Covenant of the Old Testament, part of being a Jew and being in covenant with God was for males to be physically circumcised on the 8th day after they were born.

However, TODAY, because of the fulfillment of Jesus' sacrifice, to be in covenant with God, men and women has to be circumcised in the heart. By this there is a spiritual change or cutting and washing away of a sinful life from Adam inside of the person by believing and accepting the sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

I have scriptures to reference in regards to the above paragraphs.
Romans Chapter 2: Verse 28; For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:"

Verse 29; "But he is a Jew which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not of the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."

Also, Romans Chapter 9: Verse 6; "Not as though the Word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are in Israel:"

Verse 7; "Neither because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but in Isaac shall thy seed be called."

Verse 25; "As he saith also Osee(or the book of Hosea 2:23), I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved which was not my beloved."

Verse 26; "And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God."

Verse 27; "Esaias(Isaiah 10:22-23) also crieth concerning Israel, though the number of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a REMNANT shall be saved."

So, those above scriptures speak for themselves, they speak for God and they speak for His CHOSEN.

Some other important points I want to bring up. Yes, there are prophecies against Persia or Iran, and Arab countries who come against Israel and God's future plans for Israel. However, that depends on which Israel you are talking about. Again, for modern day Israel to have victory over their enemies they have to stop being in rebellion against Yahweh, God.

Second point in relation to the above point, GOD ALREADY HAS ENOUGH PEOPLE FROM SPIRITUAL ISRAEL TO POSSESS THE LAND OF ISRAEL AND THE PROMISES GIVEN TO ABRAHAM and promises all the way through the book of Revelation. Out of the current modern day nation of Israel, we know for sure according to scriptures in Revelation, that at least 144,000 Jews will accept Jesus during the Great Tribulation Period.

In terms of getting in trouble for persecuting or harming Jews or Israel, if anyone persecutes or harms any of God's believers, whether they are Jews or Gentiles, those persecutors will be in trouble with God. People are cursed when they commit acts of evil against ANYONE who accepted Jesus Christ. So, for many people out there it is not just Jews to be worried about. You should not be committing acts of evil against anyone.

There is too much instigating and warmonging by preachers that is political and NOT OF GOD! Whatever will go down in the Middle East between Iran, Israel and the Arab countries, God still has an invitation to save Iranians and Arabs too. All Iranians DO NOT have to perish in eternity. All Arabs DO NOT have to perish in eternity either. Yahweh, God, loves Iranians and Yahweh, God, loves Arabs.

If there are some Iranians who will believe and sincerely call on Jesus, Jesus will save them; and if there are some Arabs who believe and sincerely call on Jesus, Jesus will save them too, and they will be born again. Jesus is the Messiah of all races of people who will believe.

Again, Israel is not excused from accepting Jesus Christ. If modern-day Israel want to have God's promises and be in God's kingdom, Israel as a nation must make the choice to become born again just like every other believer and follower of Christ.

Yet Again Israel Or Jews Not Excused

Hello World:
This is the third post installment on Israel not being excused from accepting Jesus. I want to pick up on some thing from the last post where I referenced several verses from Galatians Chapter 3. Once again, I want to re-interate here, that I am really on the nation of modern day or current Israel; but by NO means am I trying to be hateful to Israel or to Jews. Okay!

Just about every time someone says something bad about Israel they are labeled anti-semitic, or a racist hater of Jews. That is not always the case. I do NOT consider myself to be anti-semitic. Some media groups and some people who may read these posts may call me that.

Let me put it this way, I am not under pressure from anybody to be politically correct. It is better to be called anti-Semitic, than to be called anti-God or antichrist. Given the choices to be with the Jews and Modern day Israel, or to be with Jesus and God, I choose Jesus and God every time!

I will NOT choose Israel or the Jewish nation over Jesus Christ! I will NOT promote Israel over Jesus Christ! Why are you, the preachers, who supposed to be christians, promoting something or a group that is blatantly ANTICHRIST??? To all you preachers out there, I would not be so quick to cuddle up with a nation of people who outright rejects Jesus Christ.

If you are against Jesus Christ and against God, then you are against me and I WILL be against you, because I have Jesus Christ, the Son, and I have the Father; and me, Jesus Christ and the Father are together on the same side.

I am just going to preach and teach the truth, that many of today's preachers ignore. Look, it is very important that each and every person accept Jesus Christ, that includes every Jew. Is the history that God had with Israel important? Yes. Are the Jewish feast important? I believe so. However, your history and your feast and your religious formalities does not save you. It is Jesus Christ that saves.

Jesus said in St. Matthew Chapter 23: Verse 37; "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent to thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!"

Basically Jesus is saying how Israel who resided in Jerusalem over time have killed and rejected prophets of God. Israel have rejected people whom God sent to help them. I want to add, are you not responsible for allowing the killing of our Lord and Savior by the Romans, to go unchallenged? I know it was God's plan for Jesus our Lord, but you Israel did not even attempt to try to do anything to stop His crucifixion.

You still reject Him at the time of this post. Israel as a nation over centuries, both Biblical and modern, have time after time rebelled against God. It should also be noted that some of those Palestinians who have been pushed out of Israeli settlements and SOME who have been killed by Israelis are and were christian.

When Jesus in St. John was talking to Nicodemus A RULING JEWISH PHARISEE at that time, a very religious man, and Jesus was telling him ye or a man must be born again or he can not see the kingdom of God; Jesus did NOT say, oh yeah, by the way, each and every man must be born again, except a Jew or those from Israel. You guys from Israel are excused from this part of God's plan. WRONG!!!

Paul also said, ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God. Paul also did NOT say, Oh yeah, by the way, all have sinned and come short but Israel. ALL means everybody. Remember, I mentioned in previous posts the scripture that Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life, NO MAN cometh to the Father but by me." Jesus did NOT say no man cometh to the Father, but by me, unless you are a Jew or Israel.

Again, as I mentioned before Israel has the right to exist as a nation by God, and Israel should live in peace. However, in reality, every nation has the right to exist and every nation if they respect others should have peace. Not just Israel, but Mexico, Angola and how about Taiwan. I mean that is a no brainer.

God wants to help modern-day Israel, but Israel has to make the choice to depend on Yahweh and not depend on the United States or themselves. Let me say that the United States and other countries should be allies with Israel, but Israel needs to be closer to God than any other country and that is not the current case.

I will say more in the next post about how God wants to help modern-day Israel, and what really could end up happening to Israel and about their land for the future. All in All everybody should be peaceful under God. Of course that is not the case yet, but will be.

Two good things concerning the nation of Israel as a whole, and I want to be brief with this, is that one, after the fall of Adam and the ensuing chaos and rebellion against Yahweh, God, on earth, God re-established communication and a relationship with man through Israel being smart enough to listen and receive God at that time. That was important. Secondly, God was able to use Israel as a bloodline by which the Messiah, Jesus, came from. That also was very important.

However, now that the Messiah, Jesus Christ who is God's way, has come and many have accepted Him, God now has a NEW and larger group of chosen people who are called Spiritual Israel. Spiritual Israel consist of both natural Jews and Gentiles who have, SPECIFICALLY under God's new covenant, accepted Jesus. I am going to have to stop here and come back with a fourth installment on this subject.

Israel Or Jews Still Not Excused

Hello World:
Let me say at the start here, even though I am ripping the modern-day nation of Israel at this time frame, I do want Israel to succeed in first getting saved through Jesus Christ and being right with God; and I also want to them to succeed in their existence with peace.

I know I really have a sharp two-edged sword here, so to speak. Speaking of which I want to rip Iran and Admadinejad a little bit. You know Iran, every time you all have a national rally you do NOT have to say bad things about Israel or America. When you all do that, it only causes more tension.

I think sometimes, emphasis on SOMETIMES, you all should be able to rally your country to promote your own country's history, successes, future and unity. In other words, can you guys have a national rally that is positive towards Iran, and not focusing on Israel for a change. Everybody knows you both do not get along, but we do not have to hear about it every week either.

I am rumbling along here as the Lord is leading me, and my system goes down. As you can see I am back now. By the way, that is NOT Blogger's fault, it is on my end. I want to briefly say my equipment from my Internet Service Provider is kind of getting out-dated. I still use dial-up, and do not have high speed broadband.

Alot of internet companies, including Blogger, are constantly upgrading. So, I am saying this here in this post, there is the possibility I could be frozen out from continuing to blog here at some point because of a lack of upgrade. Because of the kind of electronic hardware I have, I can not upgrade. At this point I am not sure about getting better hardware because I am unsure about the long-term future of me blogging.

This blog should still be here with what I have posted already, but me continuing to blog live, so to speak, long-term is a status uncertain. With that, I have to weigh the cost of whether it would be worth buying better hardware. So, we will see.

I did not plan to mention that yet, until I was just bounced offline, because my Internet provider was having "technical difficulties", which is beyond my control. Again, that was NOT Blogger's fault. I remember when I first started a few years back when that would happen, I would have to remember and retype everything God spoke to me about all over again. Now, I am thankful Blogger has the automatic or real-time save as you type feature.

Okay, I was grilling Iran before the interruption. Basically, Iran you all need to sometimes focus on taking care of your own business and not be so distracted by what Israel or America are saying and doing. You want to be aware and watchful of them, but in some of those rallies and speeches you should ignore them. You do not have to always mention them or mention them by name.

You should strengthen your ties with MOTHER RUSSIA. Russia is the great equalizer in the Middle East, when it comes to Israel and America against Iran. If MOTHER RUSSIA decides it is in their best interest to MILITARILY protect Iran; America and Israel can label and call Russia all the bad names in the book they want, but I believe they would think twice and even three, four or five times before they strike Iran.

With that said above, Israel should not be militarily pre-emptive striking Iran or any other country on the basis of "what might happen" in the future, or what "appears to be". You better make sure, because people can end up dying unnecessarily on the basis of lies.

If everybody tones down their rhetoric, ultimatums and demands from all sides, then a threat will not exist, because there will not be a need to use nuclear bombs whether a country has them or is about to get them or not. They will not have the need to use them, because no one is talking smack. Understand!

In terms of bad rhetoric, that also includes the pro-Israeli western media outlets, and pro-Israeli western tele-evangelist and preachers. There is more I wanted to say about Israel and God's plans with Jesus. I have to come back on this subject of Israel not being excused from Jesus in a third post next.

Israel Or Jews Not Excused

Hello World:
Fairly recently I did a post discussing the unbelief of modern-day Israel towards Jesus and I had a series talking about Iran that just ended. Well, I want to do some follow up on Israel and mention a little bit more on Iran in here. It looks like the follow up here will be at least two posts for sure and maybe three.

I am trying to get away from dwelling on Israel's problems so much and not get sucked in by preachers who are off base, because really it is Israel's or the Jews who have a problem with God in not accepting Jesus. So, no matter how I agree or disagree with other preachers and teachers on modern-day Israel's position with God, IN TERMS OF THE LONG TERM OF ETERNITY, it is Israel who has to get their act together, NOT me or others who have accepted God's plan through Jesus Christ. I believe I will continue to mention things about Israel and other countries, anyways, as I continue to post in the future.

Scripture Reference St. John Chapter 4: Verse 21; "Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father."

Verse 22; "Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews."

23) "BUT the hour cometh and NOW is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth; for the Father seeketh such to worship him."

24) "God is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth."

What Jesus was saying in those above scriptures are very important to all His believers and followers. I mentioned in the recent post on Israel that many preachers and teachers reverence Israel way too much. Preachers act like it is a mandate that ALL reverence and fear Israel, and that Israel determines what God will do in prophetic events such as the Rapture.

Preachers act like Israel can do no wrong, and it is a sin to speak against Israel; and no matter what, we or everybody better support Israel regardless of how they behave; because God chose Israel as His people and made a covenant with Israel; and the Bible said they that bless Israel shall be blessed and they that curse Israel shall be cursed. Now what I want to do is explain, mildly, why much of that is half truth or not completely true and I will continue to show scriptures here as solid evidence.

In that recent post about nonbelieving Jews I already established from the Word of God that this modern-day Israel whom is referred to by preachers is a nation and people of liars and antichrist. This is according to 1 John Chapter 2: Verse 22. For that reason alone I can end this post, because the point to make is there. However, I want to disect and show clearly specific falsehoods preached out there about Israel.

Let me re-introduce that there are two Israels. There is a natural Israel and a spiritual Israel. This is where the scriptures I gave at the beginning with Jesus talking about Spirit and Truth come in at. Natural Israel was established through Abraham's seed from Isaac. Now it is important to note that God made a covenant of everlasting blessings with Abraham BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS A JEW. Abraham when God called him and chose his seed was technically a GENTILE.

The scripture that most preachers like to preach about blessings and cursings does not refer to the nation of Israel ONLY, but to all who are justified by faith in God like Abraham; and more specifcally, you must be justifed by faith in Jesus Christ. Now, again, I am talking about the natural modern-day nation of Israel and not the few portion of Jews who accepted Jesus, or Israel of the OLD TESTAMENT; in which many died in faith of the promise of Jesus and will inherit.

Those scriptures on those who bless and curse Israel starts from Genesis Chapter 12: Verse 2 where God is talking to Abram or soon to be changed to Abraham as follows;

Verse 2; "And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing."

Verse 3; And I will bless them that bless thee and curse them that curse thee: and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed."

Technically, even though we know that God's covenant with Abraham is through Isaac, those scriptures does NOT mention Israel in them. Also, according to my Dake's Bible that is the only place in the Bible that promise of God is SPECIFICALLY mentioned. The reason for that, is that those scriptures refer to more than just the natural nation of Israel. Those above scriptures of Genesis 12: 2-3, refer to ALL BELIEVERS who have faith in Jesus for eternal salvation, like Abraham had faith in God.

Scripture Reference Galatians Chapter 3: verse 6; "Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness."

Verse 7; " know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham."

Verse 16; "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, and to thy seed, which is Christ."

Verse 26; "For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus."

Verse 27; "For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ."

Verse 28; "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

Verse 29; "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise."

The Lord spoke to me that in addition to the promise to Abraham and his seed in Genesis Chapter 12: verses 2 through 3, that He, the Lord, wants me to edit in here some scriptures from St. John, that shows how He is greater than Abraham, and those who are the seed of Abraham, and have God's promise to Abraham are those who are in Him, Jesus Christ: as He was before Abraham and established Abraham, and with the Heavenly Father, established that promise to Abraham back in Genesis Chapter 12.

Scripture Reference St. John Chapter 8: Verse 57; "Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?"

Verse 58; "Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."

I want to pause here to come back in the next post, because I want to cover briefly about circumcision, worshipping in spirit and truth and Israel not being excused or given an exception away from Jesus Christ.

More Irony Of Being Great

Hello World:
Continuing to question being great as referenced by Jimmy Carter on America, I mentioned that I want to list some nations and persons, in no particular order, who were great. There is a catch though. The catch is they were great at doing bad things and not good things.

Nimrod was great. Ancient Babylon was great. The UNHOLY Roman Empire was great. Goliath was great. Ancient Egypt was great. Hitler was great, and in saying that read my entire post, here, for the whole explanation. The modern city of Babylon is great.

Scripture Reference Revelation Chapter 18: Verse 2; "And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and cage of every unclean and hateful bird."

Verse 20; "Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her."

Verse 23; "And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived."

Verse 24; "And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth."

Notice in those above scriptures how God uses the term great to describe the wickedness of Babylon. God is saying that this city Babylon is great, but she is great in her spiritual fornication and delicacies in turning people away from the Most High God.

She is also great at deceiving other nations with sorcery or witchcraft; and she was great at killing and causing the bloodshed of prophets and saints of God and the slaying of many others on the earth.

So, we can see from the above that even God uses the term or word great to describe someone, but it is not a good thing always. Nimrod was used by God as a mighty hunter who stabilized relationship roles within God's creation, on earth, with people verses people and people verses animals. However, Nimrod was also great at rebelling against God, and overstepping his bounds to exalt himself and nation over God.

Goliath was great in stature and power, but also great in defying the God of Israel. The Unholy Roman Empire was great at building its empire through shedding blood of the innocents and murders of many true Christians. Hitler was a great butcher of innocent Jews. Basically, all those people and nations I mentioned were great at being or in doing the wrong things. They were great at being AGAINST God and NOT pleasing God.

In America people talk about the late President Ronald Reagan being great because he bluffed down the communist Soviet Union. However, alot of people ignore the fact that Ronald Reagan in bluffing down the Soviet Union, during that process, put his own American people lives and the Russian people lives on the line for possible DEATH BY NUCLEAR WAR. REAGAN GAMBLED WITH THE LIFE OF EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN to get the Communist Russian government to fold.

The late President Reagan was also great with policies that put low-income workers out of work, and for promoting homelessness on the map. Another way of putting it, is saying homelessness was not talked about and experienced to a worser degree until President Reagan came into office during the 1980s.

What really makes a person, people or nation great? Some people are great at lying. Some are great at destroying other people's lives. Some are great at hurting people. Others are great at cursing out people. There are others who are great at tearing up stuff.

Some people are great at being used by the devil. Some people are excellent servants of Satan. They do excellent or great work for him; "in his service" as they say. Being labelled great is not always what it seems or what people claim it to be. Being great can be ironic or an oxymoron. Those are some things to think about.

There are various meanings to being great that are bad, and we should be careful about using that term to describe something or someone as being good, when in fact they are not.

Extra On Jimmy Carter And The Irony Of Being Great

Hello World:
This is the second part of the previous post involving (not current) President Jimmy Carter. I previously said that Jimmy Carter is honest or many times speaks the truth. I also mentioned that he is not perfect. He is a decent human being and a decent American.

I said, I do want to raise questions about what he said about America being a great country. First, going back to what Jimmy Carter said about Whites in America not believing Obama is qualified to lead them and, also being so angry at Obama because he is Black or African-American, not quote. Basically, what Jimmy Carter said, confirms that I am NOT an idiot.

Jimmy Carter confirms everything I said about America in my post series on the 2008 U.S. Elections, and anytime I have talked about race relations in America. Jimmy Carter confirms that I know what I am talking about. Thank you Jimmy Carter.

The media, over there in America, want to ask Obama and his staff if they agree with what Jimmy Carter said, and AGAIN, Obama and his staff caved in to evil and denied Carter's remarks, trying to make it seem like Carter is the only one who has a problem and is misguided. The media in the U.S. are evil to set up such lines of questioning, and the Obama administration are stupid to compromise with the answers they gave.

Jimmy Carter was honest and told the truth in that situation, PERIOD! You, specifically, the American media need to quit acting like you are in shock and do not know what is going on in the heartland of America. In those media video reports on healthcare, I could not find one Black person out there protesting Obama's healthcare plan.

Most if not all of those people videoed in every report were a bunch of angry White people. They were REALLY angry White people. They were angry like they despise Obama. The guy has only been in office at that time for 8 months, and is trying to implement a health program to help disadvantaged people, and many angry White Americans will not even let him get started good, to see what really will happen.

His program at that time was not even fully developed and tested and most of those White people acted like Obama just killed their grandmother or something. People can disagree with Obama and should express their opinions, but many of those protestors were ridiculously angry.

He does not have the track record of implementing policies that kill people like your buddy Bush. Also, before SOME people start, Bush may not have aborted babies, but he caused the abortions of many, many other people in other parts of the world. Hypocrites!!! Many of those protestors do not hear from God; and therefore, need to shut up and give the man a chance to do something.

I am NOT saying all of this because I agree with Obama or like Obama. I do not agree with several things concerning Obama and I am not a fan of his either. However, unlike many of those White American protestors over healthcare, I do NOT hate Obama.

Now in terms of President Jimmy Carter referring America or the United States to being great. I said Jimmy Carter is a great human being and he is a good example; however, being great is not always a good thing. One of my questions is what makes America a great country? God has shown me that being great is not always synonymous with being good. A person can be great at being bad.

My dictionary defines great as beyond the average, mighty, grand, superior, excellent. Those descriptions of great sound good, could be good, but many times may NOT be good. Now God is great, and only God can be great and good together all the time.

There have been several great nations throughout human history. Depending on who you ask from any given country, people from their native country or who are current citizens of a country will say their country or nation is great. They may not be telling the truth, and it may be a part of their belief, or it could be a part of brain-washing.

Let me put it this way, every country is not great at doing good things for God and humanity. They may be great at something else, like making tar. There have also been alot of great people to walk the earth. I want to give some examples of very bad people and nations who were great. I will have to do that in the next post.

Do not mean to tease everybody on Israel. For the first time in a long while I think I will do a double post day coming up. I did not expect this, and I want to try to get the remainder of posts on Israel in this 2009 year, and not push them into the next year.

Jimmy Carter And On Being Great

Hello World:
God immediately spoke to me this morning about doing this post and what to say. I did not plan on doing this post, but I know from asking and experience when God is speaking.

So, here I am inserting this post, between the posts on Iran and the posts on Israel. I have more to talk on Israel right around the corner. I believe I am ending the 2009 year with posts on Israel.

Okay, this subject of being great will have questions for everyone to think about, and to keep the length not too long, I will stretch this subject into two to three posts. Did anybody hear or read what U.S. President, NOT current, President Jimmy Carter said, back around the middle of September 2009, about Whites and the current U.S. President Obama?

Before I go into what was said by Carter, according to how things are done in the United States, once a person is elected to be President of the United States, even though they do not hold that office for life, they still hold that title. Also, in holding that title, they are not called former, but they are called President in present tense; even though they may not be the current President.

Now, just to paraphrase President Carter, not quote him here, Jimmy Carter said to the affect that White Americans are highly critical of and so angry with President Obama because they do not trust that he is qualified to lead the country because he is Black. To that affect, Jimmy Carter is saying that Whites do not believe that African Americans are capable of leading them or the great country.

Now, again, not specific quotes on Carter, but those words above are very similar and have the same meaning to what Jimmy Carter actually said. I could have posted the Jimmy Carter's quotes, but his quotes can be easily found if anyone looked for them online dated back, again around the middle of September 2009.

I do not think that Jimmy Carter was talking about all White people in America. In fact, Jimmy Carter is himself very White, in terms of ethnicity. Now, I do not believe I talked about Jimmy Carter hardly at all in this blog before. Let me say this about Jimmy Carter, that Jimmy Carter is one cool dude.

He is one of few people who will be honest and who many times will speak the truth about what he believes. Now, I do not agree with him on everything 100 percent like anybody else. He is not perfect. He may not have been the greatest President in U.S. history, and I would not necessarily want to go to war with him. He would not be my first choice as a partner out on a military battlefield.

However, He is very good at fighting for the poor, the oppressed and the disadvantaged. He helps fight for the causes of those in need all over the world. He is a peacemaker. He is a true christian, who has accepted Jesus Christ, who believes in and follows the true God. Again, I do not know or think that he is considered a great president, but he is a great human being.

I do want to raise questions, though, about a part of what Jimmy Carter said in terms of America being a great country. I will have to proceed to that in the next post I will squeeze in before the upcoming Israel posts.

Views On Iran Part V

Hello World:
I am going to finish up here on Iran for the time being, although I leave open the opportunity to come back to the subject of Iran or any country. Last time I was discussing some of the actions and consequences of protesting. I mentioned that America, who has complained about Iran, has its own history of harsh treatment of protestors.

By the way, America, remember your farse of an election in the year 2000, handing the incompetent and dictator Bush the Presidency over Gore? Do not tell me if a large group of American citizens protested Bush's fraudulent win over Gore back in 2000, with bottles, bats, rocks, setting cars, stores and houses on fire; blocking streets, as well as entrances to the White House, other government buildings and military installations, that the American government will not forcibly and violently remove and slam in jail as many protestors as possible.

I do want to say this about Iran and its current government. I am NOT posting all of this because I support or am in love with the Iranian government and its leaders. I am NOT buddies with Ahmadinejad. I do think that he still can be talked to and that DIRECT diplomacy should be used first before war, invasion or sanctions. If western leaders had any sense and directly talked to Ahmadinejad in a room, face to face, maybe he might listen and see the light, and actually change.

Iran needs a new government, and there are many countries that need a new government. Really, the only true and righteous government will come through God and Jesus Christ. I, as I have mentioned before in other posts, do not agree with the Islamic religion, which rules Iran. The people of Islam does NOT serve the same God or true God that Christians serve.

I want everybody all over the world to understand, that before this post and at the time of this post and most likely afterwards, that everybody or every religion does NOT serve the same God.

Continuing with the focus on Iran, women deserve to be treated better with more freedom and equality in Iran. The Ayatollah needs to be replaced, and he is no supreme leader. Yahweh, Jehovah, God is the Supreme Leader.

Views On Iran Part IV

Hello World:
In expressing views concerning the country or people and government of Iran, I want to continue on the protesting that took place there after the June 2009 Presidential election.

If you are going to BOLDLY protest and DEFY the rule of your government, and try to initiate an overthrow of sorts, which is exactly what they were or are doing in Iran, then you have to be prepared for the worse to happen to you. You as DEFIANT citizens better have weapons, be prepared to use them, and be prepared to do real serious damage and death to your government. In DEFYING the government so BOLDLY and being so violent, like many Iranians did, you better have some miraculous resources to actually win, elsewise, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME.

In addition to that, you better be prepared to DIE, go to the hospital and be dragged and slammed in prison for a very long time, when you lose. Ultimately violent protest with weak resources, such as in Iran, does hardly nothing to solve the problem with any government in power.

Your government will not listen to you and change, because they have the army and have nearly all of the firepower. That means the government has the leverage, they make the rules, they win and you lose. Again, you either go to prison, the hospital or die because you are NOT powerful enough, but want attention.

The wiser thing to do is not be violent, and not be out there tearing up the country, in the first place, because you did not get your way. Every time you lose something, you do NOT have to tear up the country, or city or neighborhoods acting like a bunch of immature children. Tearing up the place just makes it worse for every other common citizen. The people of Iran are not the only country guilty of doing that. So, that speaks to other people in other countries as well.

If it is that bad, then try and leave the country for good. Another thing, sitting or chained, blocking streets, or impeding the progress of government activities and the business happenings of average citizens is not peaceful. I am not saying those things should never be done, because sometimes they may be necessary. I am just saying doing that is not exactly peaceful.

There have been peaceful protest and marches that were not harmful to other people trying to go about their own business. However, those actions can be, not always, but can be selfish; in that, such persons doing those actions are not thinking about what harm they may be causing, holding up the next person.

People, when you disagree with your government, you can always directly tell them by talking to them about it, by phone or by mailing in letters to your government letting them know you do not like what they are doing. A public spectacle is usually not necessary and, again, tearing up the place certainly is not necessary.

When you block areas and impede progress, and again I am not saying this part should never be done, but in doing that you are asking to be REMOVED WITH FORCE OR WITH VIOLENCE. Also, America and other western countries need to quit whinning about the way the Iranian protestors have been treated, because in America, they have a history of beating and water hosing protestors also. I will be back with part 5 on my views on Iran.

Views On Iran Part III

Hello World:
Getting back to Iran's past June 2009 election, I want to make several points. Many know that the Ayatollah Cleric holds the power of the country of Iran, and that Ahmadinejad is just a figure head. However, Ahmadinejad although he is not the most powerful in Iran, does have some power in leadership, is chosen to represent the ideas of the Ayatollah; and based upon his FIRST time being ELECTED back in 2005, and in the disputed election this 2009 time; where he appeared to have a super majority; he has his supporters among the average Iranian citizens.

Even, if the voting in this 2009 Iranian election was rigged and a fraud, just by the people protesting against him AND those rallying FOR him shows even in a case of POSSIBLE fraud, Ahmadinejad has about half of the PEOPLE of the country of Iran in support of him.

It does not appear that he has only a small room full of people or twenty-percent, but he appears to have a sizeable group of supporters. The western media do not want to show or tell that part of the election. They want to show the opposition more to make it seem like Ahmadinejad received hardly no votes, and he is overwhelmingly outnumbered by those who oppose him, but that is simply not true.

Speaking of the opposition, and the leader for change in Iran who emerged in the aftermath of the election. The man the media gives attention to, really was not the real face of change and opposition in Iran anyways. The real face of change and opposition in Iran should have been a woman.

Also, Ahmadinejad only has 4 more years, so it appears he will not be in power as President for life. Also, many people who were in opposition, who protested were NOT peaceful. Many of the protestors were violent tearing up the city of Tehran, making fires and throwing rocks.

Those protestors were not all standing there with their arms folded doing no harm like western media want to portray. Some were, but many people were causing chaos. I know and saw the young lady, or father's daughter who was shot in the chest and died in that protest. That was very sad and unnecessary for her, in particular, to get shot and killed.

However, I do not put all the blame on the Iranian government for her killing. People have to understand that the Iranian government has a job to do, and that is keep order in the streets and the country among its people; and in doing that among many people who are unruly, they can not blink or be shy about hurting somebody.

Some of the blame for the young lady's death goes to the protestors who were being violent and creating an atmosphere of chaos in the streets. Secondly, and I do not mean to sound insensitive, but the father and his daughter are partly to blame as well.

The reason being is this, if the father had any wisdom he would not have allowed him and his daughter to be standing out there in that kind of environment or situation. If it was the father's idea to go out there, she, the daughter, should have said no; and she may have, and might have been forced by her father to go with him. Either way, one or both of them should not have agreed to go into that kind of environment.

Even if you are peaceful, in a melee of rocks, bottles and bullets flying you are asking for trouble. As an example if I had a daughter, I would not be just standing there with my daughter if some police, army or group of people have weapons and are using them, because in that situation somebody is going to get hurt and killed; usually an innocent by-stander always gets it badly, and I do not want it to be me, my daughter or my friends.

Views On Iran Part II

Hello World:
Iran is close to having a civil war in the country. Iran has serious divisions among its leaders and its people. As most people know, back in June Ahmadinejad was re-elected as President of Iran. Many people in Iran and outside from western countries believe the vote result was a fraud. I will come back to that later on.

Last time I was discussing how Iran would fair if they went to war against Israel. Iran appears that they would not do well in that war from a casualty count. What I am saying here is based on analysis, and Iran could surprise some people and be stronger in that regard.

Also, again the government and people of the United States, Israel and other countries have no right to tell Iran or try to force Iran not to develop nuclear weapons. Should they have nuclear weapons? No, and neither should the United States, France, Israel, Russia, China or anybody else. The same things here, I am saying about Iran and nuclear weapons, also holds true for North Korea.

The only countries who truthfully should have a say in Iran not having nuclear weapons are countries who at this point absolutely do NOT have any of those kinds of weapons! Nuclear weapon free countries also have the right to tell the United States and other nuclear countries to get rid of their nuclear weapons once and for all.

Also, I need to mention in regards to conflicts between Iran and Israel, and supposed comments by Ahmadinejad. Ahmadinejad in an interview when asked if he spoke of Israel being wiped off the map, said NO!

Adding to this, is the fact that, western governments, evangelical preachers and media speak about that propaganda of him talking about destroying Israel and all Jews. However, I have researched from MULTIPLE documents, that say there are up to as many as 25,000 Jews living in Iran.

Jews have lived there for thousands of years, when Iran was known as Persia. So, if Ahmadinejad and the Ayatollah really wanted to kill all Jews, then why is it that 25,000 Jews are living in Iran today? You would think it would be easier for Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government and military to make Jews inside of of their own country of Iran to disappear first? Those 25,000 Jews, living in Iran, do not seem to be on the verge of being killed.

I also read another report where the Israeli government offered to pay Iranian or Persian Jews a substantial amount of money to leave Iran and move to Israel; and those Jews refused the offer and decided to stay in Iran. So, if Jews are in so much danger from Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government then why did they NOT leave Iran?

So, somewhere along that line someone is lying, and falsely trying to instigate hate and world war. If I am somewhere where I do not like my environment and I am in danger because someone wants to eliminate me by killing me and they are in power; and someone, CREDIBLE, comes along and OFFERS to PAY me to move somewhere else where I would be safe, I would most likely take that offer.

Views On Iran Part I

Hello World:
The focus here is on various aspects of the country and people of Iran. What I would like to do is make quick points about Iran as a country. For several years Iran has been in conflict with Israel concerning how Jews in Israel treat palestinians as well as Israel's alliance with the United States.

The Iranian government has ties to militia groups Hezbullah and Hamas inside Israel. If one looks at a world map or Middle Eastern regional map, it can be seen that Iran is 3 countries over or distance from Israel. Iran is also a much bigger country, geographically, than Israel. I believe, however, that if Iran or any single country, in the region, attacked Israel that Israel would win.

From a military and a strategic standpoint, Israel is the strongest single country in the middle East. I do not believe today, at this time of this post, that Iran wants to go to war with Israel; nor can they afford to, because they have their own internal economic and social problems to worry about.

Right now, the Iranian government has to make sure that a civil war within their own country does not happen. The only way Iran could fight Israel and beat Israel is if Iran got some help from several other countries. Again, I think Iran can not afford to go to war with anybody at this point in time, because they are undergoing changes in the society and they are still a developing country. War would set Iran very far back in development and progress to grow as a society.

There seems to be great concern over Iran possibly developing a nuclear bomb. Even if Iran developed several nuclear bombs and launched against Israel, because of Israel's technological capabilities and experience with more already developed nukes, Israel would bring more widespread death to the Iranian population, than Iran could to Israel.

In terms of the concern of Iran obtaining nuclear bombs, I think it would be better if the United States, Israel and all those within the world community who already have many nuclear bombs, to first get rid of ALL of their nuclear bombs. Then maybe they would have some credibility to tell Iran not to develop nuclear bombs.

Like Jesus said, let he who hath no sin cast the first stone. Do not judge those by a standard that you can not hold yourself to. When I am talking about countries such as the U.S. and Israel getting rid of ALL THEIR nuclear weapons, I am not talking about some of them, or some treaty with Russia for reductions, but again the elimination of ALL nuclear weapons.

If the world community did that then they can say to Iran and North Korea, "hey look we are gestering in good faith to eliminate ALL our nuclear weapons, so we would appreciate it if you all would do the same. Then Iran and North Korea might be more inclined to listen to the world community. There is more I want to say about Iran, so I will make a part 2.

Putting The Pieces Together On Israel

Hello World:
This post is in conjunction with the previous post on Israel before it. When I said in the last post I felt led of the Lord to discuss something concerning modern day Israel, I thought that would be one post and done. This is not the case.

I came across a report that relates to some of what I am saying here, about Israel and how they feel about Jesus. I wanted to place the entire URL right here so everybody could click on the link or type it, but it is too long. The report is from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/. When I placed the long version here, it could be clicked on, but on my browser the entire URL was not visible, and I am able to reconfigure my browser to resize page, and all of it still was not visible.

I want to use the report as a confirmation reference to what I said concerning Israel and am about to say in the near future. The Timesonline has alot of news articles, so if you go to their homepage you might have to search alot. However, because of this I will have that report in my side link section, under a similar title.

For those who may be new to my blogsite here, all you have to do is scroll down my blog page, and look at the information on the side of my posts. As you scroll down and looking on the side, go beyond the scriptures section and just below my blog archive section, and then you will come up on my link section.

Click on the TimesOnline side link and it will take you directly to that specific news article I want to use as a confirmation reference during this time; because this link, like some other links, may not be permanent although I am not ruling that out.

There is also another website I am currently researching that is related to what I am saying about Israel. I am thinking about putting a link up to that website as well. After this post I am going to move into a 5-part series about some things that happened in Iran. After I finish with Iran, I feel led by God to come back to discuss, in multiple posts, more about Israel.

I wanted to go into talking about health and nutrition ending out the 2009 year, as I said several posts back. However, I am changing that, because of what the Lord has been showing me about Israel. I have to push talking about health and nutrition forward to the new year 2010. Unless God leads me differently.

What God has spoken to me about concerning Israel as I mentioned much in the previous post kind of surprised me. I really had no idea I was going to talk about the things I am talking about at this point. It started with some ministers saying alot of things about Israel in prophecy, and as I was listening, some things they were saying did not sound right.

Then I ask the Lord about why that was, and the Lord spoke to me and led me to 1 John Chapter 2: verses 22-23. Then I thought I was done, and someone else was talking to me about Israel, and I gave them the scriptures from 1 John, and we got into this debate. I really did not want to continue on the subject, because it seems kind of dark.

So, the person wanted to continue, and I declined, because I am confident in what God spoke to me about, and I do not want to try to influence someone who does not want to be influenced. So, I really wanted to be done with that subject of Israel, but God started dealing with me and told me I was not done yet. So, after the Iran series, people will see what I am talking about.

With the other website I am researching on Israel, the guy there has the same scriptures from 1 John that I do, and we do not know each other and have not exchanged information before. I have never seen his site before, and only decided to research his information after I posted everything I had on Israel and what I have scheduled.

I do NOT agree with the person or his website information 100 percent, but I think it is interesting that we are kind of saying almost the same things about Israel. It is like the whole Israel thing is a puzzle, and God is showing me that certain pieces of the puzzle do NOT FIT and WHY they do not fit.

Nonbelieving Israel/Jews According To God's Christian Bible Are Antichrist

Hello World:
I felt led of the Lord to bring up something concerning modern day Israel and the Jewish people. Most Jews in Israel and elsewhere do not except Jesus Christ as the Messiah or Savior of mankind. Now, that is a MAJOR problem for the Jews and the country of Israel. I talked about this before about Israel or the Jews, interchangeable, not accepting Jesus Christ.

Many preachers and evangelicals reverence the Jewish people and the land of Israel. There is alot of western talk about Israel being pressured by the U.S. to split up land with the Palestinians. Someone even believes that America will suffer God's wrath because of its supposed pressure on Israel to divide their country.

I do believe America will suffer God's wrath, but not solely or only because of them pressuring Israel to give up land, but for several other ungodly reasons. Israel should not have to give up land, because for one reason they do not have alot of land at the present.

Upon what I know and believe, the Palestinians need a stable homeland too, but I do not believe that Israel should split up their country to give to the Palestinians. I do think that the Palestinians should be treated better from a humanitarian standpoint, but that does not mean dividing Israel.

In all of this I have to say something very harsh about Jews and Israel. With what I am going to say, I want to say this first again, that I love the Jews and Israel. I do NOT hate Israel. However, Modern Day Israel, at the time of this post, has again, that major problem with God I mentioned at the start of this post, that nobody has talked about and really seem to completely ignore. This is a problem that Israel needs to correct right away.

Back when I was talking about the Rapture and 2008 Heaven series, I mentioned that Israel or a majority of Jews are going to go through the Tribulation period. I mentioned, before, the reason being is that they do not believe in Jesus Christ as the Messiah; and it is Jesus who is the main person who will provide believers an escape to Heaven from the Great Tribulation period.

Now many evangelicals and Christian scholars and teachers teach and preach like endtime events will not happen without Israel's permission. I got news for all of you preachers and scholars, the Rapture WILL happen without Israel. God will determine endtime events without Israel's permission.

There are some Jews who have miraculously accepted Jesus as the Messiah in several parts of the world. Those few Jews who do believe on the Lord Jesus are saved and will escape the time of trouble of the tribulation to come. Those FEW Jews who believe in Jesus are blessed of God.

HOWEVER, the MAJORITY of Jews and Israeli Jews as a whole have, again, NOT ACCEPTED JESUS as the Christ. They are nonbelievers and are in the class of liars and antichrists according to the Word of God. That is a CRITICAL point that most preachers and teachers of bible prophecy and endtime events ignore.

Too many preachers are giving MODERN DAY Israel and the Jews, as I mentioned before, too much reverence! Right now Israel and many Jews are actually against God and opposite of God in their belief system of not accepting Jesus Christ as the Son of God and the Messiah. I have scriptures to prove this.

Scripture Reference; 1 John Chapter 2: Verse 22, "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son."

Verse 23, "Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father.........."

So, because modern day Israel and many Jews do not accept Jesus as the Christ, the Savior and Son of God, the Father, they are, again, actually antichrist; and that spirit of antichrist is upon all unbelievers or nonbelievers and not just Jews. Henceforward, the Jews or Israel need to reconcile with God and accept His way, by Jesus Christ the Son.

Some will not do this until they go through the Great Tribulation, in which they face the MAIN person of Antichrist who will seek to destroy them. When they acknowledge the true Christ Jesus, then God will save them from the trouble of the main antichrist and they will join other believers in the kingdom of God.

The true Israel who has favor and blessings with God in the everlasting covenants with Abraham, both natural and spiritual are ALL BELIEVERS WHO ACCEPT THE SON, JESUS THE CHRIST AND THE FATHER. Another thing to all you preachers and teachers and prophecy experts, it is MORE important to reverence God and His way by Jesus, than any people or any country; and you all need to preach the truth about how bad it is and will be for Israel and other people who do NOT accept Jesus Christ.

THERE IS NO TWO WAY STREET TO HEAVEN OR EVERLASTING LIFE. THERE ARE NO MANY WAYS TO HEAVEN OR TO GOD. ANY COVENANT WITH GOD IS NOT VALID WITHOUT JESUS CHRIST. I hope that is clear. JESUS IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE. NO MAN, ABSOLUTELY NO MAN, NATION OR COUNTRY OR PEOPLE CAN COME TO THE FATHER BUT BY JESUS; ST. JOHN 14:6.

Using Links And Responding To Emails Pt.2

Hello World:
As I was finishing talking about emails and links in the last post, I mentioned that although I will be looking closely at emails and who they come from, I do not want to discourage people from emailing me. So, again, YES it is okay to email me. Also again, if I find your link something of interest I will possibly email you back personally.

There are alot of frauds and funny people, or context meaning, there are plenty of BAD people on the internet. So, I am being careful to whom I respond back to by email for all sorts of reasons.

So, if I do not respond back to you personally, look for me at some point to respond in general in one of my posts. I want to be very careful, and I will protect what God has given me here. At the same time, I do not want to completely ignore people either.

In my profile there are a list of my interests. A few of my interest have a relationship with the theme of my blog, but not all of them. There are many outside links related to my interests that are NOT compatible with my blog theme or links section.

To try to make what I said above clearer, if for example I have in my profile interest that I like basketball. That does not mean that on my blog I want to have a link to a sports store that sells basketballs. That also does not mean that my interest in basketball is a theme of my blog.

All that means is that basketball is a personal interest of mine. That would have absolutely nothing to do with the message that God would have me to present. Now, I may talk about basketball or other sports in a future posts, but more than likely, again, basketball, in itself, would not be the theme.

There are also some stores I may possibly want to link to my site to help others or to refer ideas for others; however, I have not been contacted by the right ones that would fit this blog yet. It comes down to God's message and how He directs me. Also, If I know you or if I am familiar with your site then there is a chance of link consideration.

Several links I have placed on my blog are highlights or key messages from my blog that emphasize the overall theme of the blog. Some other links I placed in, before, as references to subject matters of post in my blog.

In other words, instead of me having a pop-up reference link in my post that blocks the reader's information, I put the link by name in my sidebar. That way a person can read the posted information, undistracted by pop-ups, and move to my link section in the sidebar, and click on that link name to confirm the reference information. I did this with the Pew Research Center in regards to Part 13 of my U.S. election series. I find it easier on occasion to put some references in my link section.

I do not consider all my links to be permanent. Some can and will be, but not all of them. I will change and delete a link, and have already from time to time. So, please do not be surprised if my links list changes.

Another thing, in regards to my anonymity. I mentioned on my sidebar one of the reasons for being anonymous was to help everyone to focus more on God. For those of you who are concerned about my credibility, this is how I have been led by God from the beginning.

I am just speaking for myself, and there are many anonymous people online, and some of them I do not blame them for being anonymous. However, everybody who is anonymous is NOT led to be because of God. This, being led of God to be anonymous during this time, is MY story; and I am very confident in what God has told ME to do.

I have not burdened anyone for favors or money. The most important thing is that I have credibility with God. Do not mean to sound mean or cruel, but again, just speaking for myself, for those who are concerned, you will know who is credible if you truly know God and have discernment.

There is too much suffering and too much evil and foolishness going on in the world, and it is important to me to speak out and fight against those things. At some point I may reveal who I am, but I may never do it. If I do reveal who I am, I prefer to be led by God and it be on my terms. Those are my rules, and anyone who has a problem with that should take it up with God.

Using Links And Responding To Emails Pt.1

Hello World:
I feel the need to talk about the links situation with my blogsite. Basically I am going to discuss some things in relation to people who link to my site and me using other people links as well. This is in response to some repeat emails I have received in that regard.

Firstly, no one has to ask if they want to link to my blog or in this case put my blog on their website as a link. People have done this already without asking me. It is very easy to link up with anybody using their URL. I have done this with my links. I can not actually control who puts my blogsite URL on their site as a link.

So, if someone puts a link on their site to my blog, which again, has been done already, it is not that critical to me. However, with that said, just because someone links to this blog does NOT mean that I endorse that person or group.

As many of you, who are familiar with the internet, know a URL can be pasted and found on almost any website. So, just because you may see YahwehsEmissary.blogspot.com on any given website, does not mean I am buddies with that site or owners of that site.

Now, if I am asked for permission, I will check your website and I may not personally or directly respond back. However, as I said at the beginning of this post today, you really do not have to ask for that specifically. Now, there are plenty of other things I would prefer people to ask me about, but linking is not one of them. Do I want to be linked to a Satanist person or group website? NO!!! Would I like to be linked to a atheist website? NO, AGAIN!!!

I am not going to waste time tracking people down who link with me either. If there is something I find out about and I do not like it, the persons responsible will hear about it. Anyways, I have reason to believe if my blog is put on someone else's website it is to my advantage. I especially have the advantage if the website linking to my blog is contrary to my message about God here.

Now with all of that said above, I still will accept emails, but I will be scrutinizing emails that I receive, or investigating emails in a number of ways. If you email me something that I find interesting I will possibly get in touch with you directly. I do not want to discourage people from emailing me. I will explain more and clarify some more things about emailing me and links in part 2.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 15

Hello World:
I am still on the U.S. elections, continuing here on Sarah Palin and her political party being unjustly against the right to choose for women. This world is full of wicked people who prey on women, and women need to be able to fight back with choices about what to do with their own body after they have been sexually assaulted. I know that people have made exceptions to give birth and raise a child after being raped, and that is their choice; however, the seed of a rapist is NOT innocent and does NOT deserve to live.

I am not talking about a person who is growing up or who has grown to an adult and it is found that he or she is a product of rape, and they should be killed when found out; NO! I am talking about before they are born or coming out of the womb they should not be allowed to live; because that is NEVER God's plan for a woman to have a baby that way, by rape! The kind of spirit behind that is NOT of God, and so the resulting product should be terminated.

Conservative preachers can preach all they want about life upon conception, and scriptures on King David talking about God forming him in the womb, and choosing a prophet like Samuel, or judge like Sampson before they were born, and knowing great men and women before they were born. Of course God should know all of that and equip a specific one for service in the mother's womb, like John the Baptist; however, God has not chosen EVERY baby to be born to be great or do something great for Him!!!

What about a ungodly woman who sleeps around and has many children taxing the system; and then there are Godly, righteous women who are married and following the moral rules; but as hard as they try, can not get pregnant. I am in no wise blaming that on God, but my point is just because a woman got pregnant DOES NOT mean that God endorses that pregnancy.

Jesus said in St. Matthew Chapter 20: Verse 16; "So, the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called but few chosen."

St. John Chapter 13: Verse 18; Jesus said, "I speak NOT of you all: I KNOW WHOM I HAVE CHOSEN: ........."

2 Timothy Chapter 2: Verse 29; "Nevertheless, the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are HIs. And Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity."

So, from those scriptures, I say that God is very choicey. Again, He has not chosen every baby to be a king David or to be a Prophet Samuel, or to be born at all. Again, many babies are conceived and born out of the will of God or without God's endorsement!

Therefore an argument that is preached about God knowing a person before they are born; or choosing, SPECIFIC, persons in the womb over time, has nothing to do with the fact that there are babies born in wickedness, whos' MOTHERS THE DEVIL ASSAULTED to have them; who grow up to serve the devil, causing great harm to many, who are absolutely none of His(God).

Turning back to politics in general, politics can be nasty and unfair. Also, the Democratic party is not the greatest party. However, these days, and for several decades, they have been more in favor of the common people and overall better than Republicans. Sarah Palin, you at the time of me creating this post stand with a group, the Republicans who are against God and who are against women.

Sarah Palin, if you truly want to be on God's side, as I mentioned above, one of the things you need to stand for are policies that are FOR women, like a woman's right to choose, and quit supporting groups that do not have the best interest of women in mind.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 14

Hello World:
I am still focusing on Sarah Palin at this point in this election series. Sarah accepted that position of running for Vice President prematurally. Many of her responses were not intelligent, and what happened was she really made women, as a whole, look bad in terms of not being knowledgeable about her nation and the world.

I do not mean to make fun here, but on the surface she is a pretty woman, but inside she looked stupid, and again, that was a bad impression in representing women. I believe Sarah is intelligent, it is just that she did not look like it then.

That stage was bad timing for her; and perhaps many of us have been there, where we can do better, and maybe even know how, but wind up messing things up. We mess up because we did not prepare right, do not have the confidence, or just for unkown or other reasons had a bad day. In terms of representing women as the Vice-President, there are other beautiful and knowledgeable women out there who could have done a much better job.

Another thing, in an interview question about a view on the "Bush Foreign Policy", the best answer would have been that you disagree with it. That is even if you did not fully understand his policy; which at that point you should have known, about, who you and McCain, potentially, was going to succeed in office.

Even if you do not understand the policy or the question, you can say, look, I have my plan of foreign policy and how I will implement it. Basically, you do not have to know everything, or have all the answers, but you do need to have a plan.

Again, you can not just show up on national television, and not know anything about those holding office before you, and also not have your own plan with confidence. Know one or the other. In other words, know either his past plan, or know your future plan, or know both to be able to give some kind of intelligent explanation. That interview along with other ones were a disaster for her.

Next thing Sarah, as a woman or any woman, who truly live for the causes of women, you should not let anyone take away a woman's right to choose. Now, I am talking about being for Women's rights and causes, NOT against, but for. Being pro-life is lame and hypocritical when it is okay to go to some other country and kill leaders and innocent people in invasions and wars.

Abortion is the stopping or termination of any life, not just babies. Abortion is not the main problem anyways, but it is the causes or things that lead a woman to having an abortion; or what would cause her to make a justifiable choice in that regard.

Too many conservatives focus, fast, and have all these prayers to stop abortion, when what they really should be focusing on is stopping the causes that lead to a decision to have an abortion. It is not the abortion doctors fault or the abortion clinics fault that are set either. You first need to stop all rapes from happening.

Also, how about stopping ALL incest. In addition, why do you not stop and prevent ALL women's lives who will be in danger if they were to give birth. Another thing, stop ALL of the inhuman and unmanageable sufferings caused by birth defects.

So, until you can stop ALL of these atrocities and sufferings that women go through, that cause them to make the decision to go have an abortion, then you and all other supposed pro-lifers have no righteous or just case. Stop ALL of those problems of women wrongfully getting pregnant, and then you will not have to worry about the large numbers of abortions.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 13

Hello World:
Before I go on discussing Palin, I want to briefly change subjects to talk about Jesus' real birthday. Back in 2007, I mentioned in my Christmas post series that around the time of September 11th, 3 B.C. is the approximate real date of the birth of Jesus. There is alot of evidence, out there and within the Bible that shows that Jesus was NOT born in the month of December.

I do not want to repeat everything from that series, but as I mentioned before, someone else was born on December 25th, and that person was not Jesus. Another thing I want to point out about this, is that, Jesus' real birthday of September 11th, 3 B.C., from my research, is by using the current solar calendar, that many people throughout the world use today. If someone uses a Hebrew/Jewish Lunisolar calendar, it would show that Jesus birthday would fall AROUND the time of August 22.

So, the time frame, in terms of months for Jesus to have been born is between mid to late August and mid to late September. Again, using, specifically, the current solar calendar that many use today, including myself, the more accurate birthdate of Jesus Christ, again, is around September 11th, 3 B.C. timeframe, most likely right on to the day.

Picking up on Palin from last time, I am going to be really tough on her here. As I mentioned before about her good fashion sense, can we imagine if she was the President, how many people all over the world would watch her just because of her good looks. Never mind that she may not be making any sense in what she is saying.

Now I have to sort of disect Sarah Palin from a decision and policy making standpoint. Just a few months back, Sarah resigned as Governor of Alaska. There are many rumors as to why she did this. Some are saying that she is fed up with politics. Some are speculating that her political future and bid to be elected President in 2012 is over and dead.

Sarah does not seem too concerned about her political future success. I can almost say right now for sure, that she will not be elected as U.S. President in 2012. The way Obama is going so far, I do not believe anybody will stop him in 2012. At this point, Obama is on course for re-election. At the time of this post, the Republican party, to whom Sarah Palin still belongs to, at the moment has nobody who can compete with Barack Obama in 2012.

Interchangeably here and in the next several posts, I am, from time to time, going to address Sarah directly, and also as second person. For starters, I want to say to Sarah Palin or about Sarah Palin is that she made the wrong choice for starters in choosing to be a conservative Republican. I want to point out something, that it is okay to have some conservative views, but the American brand of Republican conservatism is too extremist and bad for people. Sarah, if you were smart, you would drop the Republican party like a bag of heavy bricks.

In fact, no women and this also includes Nikki Haley from South Carolina, if they were smart, would be a Republican. Nikki believe me when I say you are currently on the wrong side. The Republican party has policies that are heavily anti-women, racist, and anti-poor. The only group that the Republican party stands for are rich, White men. What I mean by rich, I mean by couples or families who make over $250,000 and singles who make over $100,000 in income, or around the top 30%(percent) of all people living in the U.S.

In addition to the above paragraph, I just have to mention some information from a outside reference. I retrieved some information on political party trends and values from a organization called the Pew Research Center. I want to provide the following quote from a page of how this organization describes itself. Pew says, "The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press is an independent, non-partisan public opinion research organization that studies attitudes toward politics, the press and public policy issues."

One of Pew's survey reports from May 21st, 2009 shows through their research that the Republican party in the U.S. is 88 percent White-Anglo, the same as in the year 2000. The Democratic party has changed from 64 percent White Anglo to 56 percent in eight years. Much of what I have been saying in this U.S. election series concerning race problems in America is highly confirmed by that Pew report.

The Democratic party shows more racial diversification whereas the Republican party does not. One should believe and conclude, from the above political party percentages that, the more racial or ethnic diversification in a party, the more concerns and actions FOR social and economic equality and fairness will be in a party for EVERY racial or ethnic group. The Republicans with their SUPER, SUPER majority (88%)make-up of Whites lack that needed diversification, concern and actions.

With that said above, the Republican party has members, who are non-white, women and people who work hourly jobs making $50,000 or less, who foolishly and ignorantly follow the party's causes. Many of these followers who work hourly do not even realize, that they support people like John McCain, who actually works against them, by him voting between 17 to 19 times against minimum, or hourly wage increases as I mentioned a few post back.

The Republican party of the U.S., and its leaders are NOT compassionate! They use alot of people that they do not care about helping. They do not care about helping the common man. They are concerned about having all the decision making power and all the riches, and will use whoever will foolishly and ignorantly let them.

Also, Sarah when John McCain came to you to join him as his running mate, you should have said NO, because you were not well versed in national or foreign policy. It is okay to say you do not want to do it. It is okay to say you are not ready.

If you were passionate about being a leader at that level, you should have just waited, not accepted McCain's offer and went to do your own study and gather more knowledge and experience about the world before going on that stage.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 12

Hello World:
I want to focus alot of this post on Sarah Palin. I am going to be at times brutally honest here. I am always honest, but I am going to be more brutal and I feel that it is needed here. It would be good if America did have a woman president, as long as the woman is not a conservative Republican.

Now I have to compare Hillary Clinton to Sarah Palin a little. Between the two women, I believe that Hillary Clinton would make the better President, while Palin would look prettier. Now, I do not agree with everything about both of these women. I think though that Hillary is more knowledgeable about public policy and would be better at development and planning of policies, and I believe Hillary's policies would actually help more people in need than Palin's policies.

In the next several paragraphs, I am going to briefly give my impressions of Hillary and Sarah, based on their appearance. In the previous post, I talked about Hillary being, in some ways conservative concerning some of her foreign policy engagement. However, the good thing is that she does NOT hold to ALL of the ideas of conservative Republicans.

Hillary is also conservative in how she carries herself and how she dresses. Hillary's movements and mannerisms appears stiff and politically scripted. In other words, it is as if someone coached her to behave a certain way to please the political establishment, and she is not really free in expression.

It is okay to be coached, and I am sure Palin had alot of coaching and others are coached as well; but it is not good when you can not freely express yourself. In addition, Hillary's appearance in how she dresses looks to be scripted from someone else. Hillary dresses like one of the boys, or lets say, one of the boys from Washington so to speak. Pants suits are so NOT feminine. Pants suits is being one of the guys, to prove to everyone that you are equal with the men.

To go with the pants suits, is the short hair cut look that Hillary has. That is a compromise to give up femininity to, again, please the political establishment. A woman can still be a woman and lead without looking or dressing like one of the boys. Hillary Clinton is NOT good at that, and Sarah Palin IS.

Sarah Palin gets the best dress award out of all the mentioned persons in this series so far. Sarah, although she is a conservative in policy decisions, does not dress conservative. Hillary on the other hand, appears more covered up from neck to toes, short hair cut, conservative, dull and dry and predictable in expression. Those are some of my impressions from Hillary and Sarah's appearance.

Now, a problem with Palin is that her Republican party paid $150,000 for her wardrobe in reports. Sarah Palin knows how to dress like a woman, and her husband should be glad of that, but a woman does not have to buy expensive clothing to look beautiful, sexy or like they are on the high-end of the monetary society.

To all woman, you do not have to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to look good like Sarah Palin. I think Sarah knows this too, but I think she was just going with the flow and not challenging her advisors. Women, you can look very good, or excellent and spend less.

Now, I do not want to ever complain about a woman looking good, but I do want to say that a woman needs to keep things in persepective and be smart about spending money. Clothes similiar to what Palin was wearing during the campaign, can probably be purchased ranging in prices between $5,000 to $13,000; leaving the remaining $137,000 to $145,000 spent by Palin's Republican party to go to important social causes. However, this is a major problem with the Republicans; is that they do not think like that.

Those above figures for purchasing clothes, I gathered from looking at some clothes and prices from various stores in different parts of the world, and calculating the number of different outfits needed to be worn, with shoes, for a certain number of days. It would appear that a wardrobe or set of clothes, such as what Palin was wearing, does NOT NEED to cost anywhere near $150,000.

Again, Palin looked good, and she dresses like a woman supposed to dress, from EVERY article of clothing. She also has the right hair length too. Women, long hair is always a plus. That is surprising to me about Palin, because she appeared to be very tom-boyish growing up with her basketball days. However, Palin learned how to be woman.

Being feminine is lost with alot women nowadays. Femininity or being feminine is an art. It should be natural for women, but women lose it growing up in a masculine or male, stress-led society and from getting bad advise. In many places, too many women dress and look like a dude. Societies have become a collective masculine hive, where almost everybody looks the same, on behalf of political correctness.

So, women and young ladies growing up, if you want to know or learn how to dress like a woman should, Sarah Palin is a good example for you to learn from. Later though, I am going to rip into Sarah, from a policy standpoint, in the next post. However, from a women's fashion sense, that is a big plus or good thing about Sarah Palin.

Now, which is more important policy or good looks? Well, policy is more important, but for women, do not compromise away from what should be natural.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 11

Hello World:
I want to cover today some things about former Republican presidential candidate John McCain, and on the democratic side Hillary Clinton. I am going to have to talk about Sarah Palin, who ran with McCain, in the next post after this. One reason why I am mentioning McCain, Hillary, Palin, Biden and Obama in this series is because just about all of them are having an influence, either good or bad in the near future, in many areas of the world.

I believe that John McCain was not a good candidate for president. For starters I do NOT believe the political party, Republican, that McCain represents is a good party to lead ANY country during this time-frame.

McCain although he served his country in the military, divorced his FIRST wife after she suffered in a car accident, and married another women, still current. I did some research into McCain and his ex-wife, and from my research, McCain instigated the divorce and it was not pretty how he did it.

His ex-wife eventually conceded, but some are calling the way McCain divorced his wife, abandonment. Now, according to Jesus this is adultery. There is a better way he could have handled that situation, and not even have to leave his first wife. There are things a couple can work out because of this exception, and agreements can be made between the two people married, that I believe God will understand; but you just should not leave your spouse because they got into an accident.

Another thing, I researched reports about McCain's record on voting on the mininum wage. McCain's record, according to 4 or 5 reports show a horrible quality that defines him, and really defines his political party and many who support and voted for him. I saw some reports that showed McCain, serving as a U.S. Senator for the people, voted AGAINST raising the minimum wage nineteen times.

In others words, he, McCain, voted AGAINST GIVING LOW INCOME WORKERS a raise 19 times; not just once or twice for obscure reasons, but again NINETEEN TIMES. I saw a couple of others that said he voted AGAINST it seventeen times. However, 17 or 19 times, that is still alot of times to neglect low income families or the poorer groups in a society.

Those two things, in the above paragraphs concerning McCain are two major problems that directly affected other people in a bad way. So, seeing just those few things, I would have a problem with McCain and his Republican political party, and so does God.

On to Hillary. Hillary Clinton, who ran for president on the democratic side, but lost to Obama, has probably the better domestic policies, especially in the case of women and minorities. I am not too confident about her foreign policy ideas.

Everybody knows her husband, Bill Clinton, who I think is one of the best presidents America ever had. However, with Hillary, although I thought from a domestic standpoint, she would be a good choice to lead, I would not see her being as good, overall, as her husband was. Some people might disagree, but I think despite her party affiliation, Hillary is in some ways conservative, and more conservative than people think.

I think some of her foreign policy views about diplomatic engagement with conditions on the other party, appear to compromise with the conservative Republicans ways of thinking. In some ways she is different from Bush; but in other ways like not talking directly to Ahmadinejad without conditions, just like she can sit with Israel's Netanyahu, she is more like Bush.

So, to that extent, I think that is a problem, because she is not giving each leader equal respect without reason of direct negative provocation. Also, Hillary, in public, has always appeared to be too ambitious, in relation to personal necessary responsibilities I will not mention at this time. I have more to say about Hillary in the next post, when I lead in with Palin.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 10

Hello World:
In this post I want to cover some things about the U.S. Vice-President Joseph Biden. First, let me say that I really want to mention things about Sarah Palin, and a little with Hillary Clinton. After this post, I should be discussing much about Palin in the next post. I am really closing in on her in this blog. I just have to be a little more patient.

I think the U.S. Vice-President Joseph Biden is a decent person. He has alot of foreign policy experience, and understands alot of what is going on in many parts of the world.
Actually, Biden probably should be the U.S. President, but when he ran during the campaign, most Americans paid him no mind; because most Americans really do not have a clue about the wider picture of who they choose as their leaders.

However, I think of all the people who ran for president in 2008, including Obama, Joseph Biden from a policy and world experience point of view, probably was the most qualified to be president. Having the policy and world experience does not necessarily translate into a good president, the best president, or good or great leader. However, it does help.

Although a person does not have to know everything to be a president of any country. A person should know some things and at least have a plan or a vision for his or her country. Again, it was about time and long overdue that America finally elected a QUALIFIED Black person, or non-White person for a change.

One knock on Biden to me is that he seems to be beholden to the Catholic church. Now this does NOT make him a bad person, but everybody who reads my blog, know I preached about critical problems with the Catholic church and their doctrine before.

There was another issue I had with Biden, in which, he talked about questioning a person's judgement and not questioning a person's motive, unquoted.

It is important to question a person's motive, especially if you do not know the person or understand the situation, or if what the person is doing does not seem to be right or is blatantly wrong.

A person's judgement or what they actually do stems from his or her motive. The motive is what the person intends to do or really mean or want to do in their heart. Many people will say that you or I can not know what is in a person's heart, or their motive for doing something, or before they do something. People will say you can not read a person's heart or their mind. Well, I have to disagree and say yes you can.

Now, to some degree it is true that most, if not all of us, can not know a person's heart or motives. Most people can not read minds. However, God knows what is in a person's heart. God knows what a person is thinking. If you are close to God and listening to God, God can tell you about a person's motives.

God can tell you all about a person. God can reveal, to somebody, details about a person and details about a situation. So, it is not you, but God telling you. Alot of people will go into a church or be around a Godly person, and the Godly person, hearing from God, will tell the person about themselves. The person being told, who usually is living a life of sin, anyways, will will not like what they are told and get mad.

That person, being exposed by God, gets offended and wants to complain, angrily, that so and so pastor or preacher or lay person do not know anything about them. They are looking at the pastor or preacher just as a human and not as a representative of God whom God is using. It is true that the pastor or preacher is a human, but even more important is that, that human is a pastor or preacher for a reason.

That reason is God has chosen that specific human to be His messenger. So, God will use the human person and show him what He, God knows, and tell him to speak or reveal the information. It is revelation from God. Also, again, it does not have to be a pastor or preacher. It can be any specific person who is close to God who is pleasing God with their life; Whom God will speak to or give revelation to.

So yes, with the help of God, you can read a person's heart, thoughts or motives. Again, if you can not trust the person, or something seems very wrong, you need to question the other person's motive. That way you do not have to question their judgement, because, hopefully by questioning their motive you can prevent bad judgements from happening in the first place.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 9

Hello World:
As I am going through this series on the past year's elections in the U.S. I am not covering everything about those elections. I am mostly focusing on the Presidential part of those elections. There was other offices up for elections in the U.S. Congress, for example, and there were state initiatives that were voted on such as gay marriage or same-sex marriage approval.

It should be noted that in some states in the eastern section of the country, the people voted in favor of same-sex marriages; while in California, on the west coast of the country, the people voted against same-sex marriages. There was some uproar over the California vote, however, ultimately this is a good thing with what happened in California.

Not to be hateful towards gays or lesbians, but according to the Bible, God is against homosexuality. I pointed all of this out before, and as I am at the beginning of this post, I do not want to spend too much time on this. However, I do want to say that homosexual individuals, gay or lesbian, should not be discriminated against in terms of employment, education and health care. They should be treated as equal human beings, even though they live a disagreeable lifestyle.

In other words from the above paragraph, just because they are homosexual does not give any of us a right to neglect them if they need help socially or economically. Now, just because I or you help them does not mean that we agree with what they are doing, or that they are okay with God, or that we are going against God by helping them. No, that is not the case.

However, the homosexual lifestyle also does not have to be institutionalized with couples being treated like those in traditional marriages. Going to that point is going too far, and goes beyond helping a human being in need to going in defiance of God. So, nobody should want to do that.

If homosexuals want to be a couple, then they have to be on their own. Also, in the church no homosexuals or gays should be leaders or teachers in the church; because this, again, is in direct violation and defiance of what God says. Some things homosexuals should not attempt to do, and teaching or ministering as leaders in a church is one of them. I did not say they can not be a member of a church, participate or fellowship in a church, or that they are not saved.

They can fellowship and be a part of a church, but they should not lead there. It is just like a blind person, you do not want to deny the blind person what they need to have, and you want to treat them equally, however, you can not allow a blind person to drive a car or fly a plane. If you do, you are asking for a disaster. That analogy of the blind is what I am talking about with homosexuals or homosexuality.

Again, I do not hate homosexuals and no one should hate them. I read a couple of reports where several persons who were gay, were attacked and assaulted or literally beaten up. They were beaten up and taunted because they are gay. This is wrong.

It is flat out wrong to physically assault a person or group or their property or rob them because they are gay. That is not of God. That person is probably not hurting anyone and minding his or her own business, and besides, again they are still a human being.

If a gay person harrasses another person, or try to influence the next person, all the person has to do is say no thanks, or I do not swing that way, or that is not my kind of thing. Homosexuals should not be beaten because we disagree with them. If you are attacked or assaulted by homosexuals, then that is different and you have the right to defend yourself.

I mentioned this before, but nobody is perfect, but God really made a strong action of judgement against homosexuality probably more than any other sin. Not that God favors any sin, but he did something really strong against homosexuals in the Bible and spoke against that lifestyle very strongly.

So, if you are a homosexual or you want to vote in favor of homosexual couples, the way God approached the lifestyle is something to think about. So, homosexual's rights as a couple was part of the 2008 U.S. elections, with some states in favor of and some against. I am just here to say that God is against.

Henceforward, we should obey God. Let me say this to homosexuals, God still loves you as a person, it is the lifestyle that He hates. So that is important. Now, if God just so happens to come out and clearly say that, hey, being homosexual or gay or lesbian is okay, and that He will not punish those, for eternity, who engage in that lifestyle, then it will be fine. However, God has not came out and said that.

Now, I know some people will say the scriptures say God does not change. Yes, I know, however, God could change if He wants, or He could change or modify His rules or commandments if He choose. Nobody can stop God if He want to change, we can complain and hope that He will listen, and do something, but nobody can really stop God.

However, to this point, all His rules including being extremely against homosexuality remains the same. I did not expect to go this deep into that subject today. I wanted to talk about Biden. For sure, in part 10, I should be talking about Biden.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 8

Hello World:
As I continue on Obama, since he is the U.S. President through 2012, I will from time to time, come back to him possibly in this blog at any given time or topic. Some of the things I am going to say here deal with both the past year 2008 and the present and future.

In terms of God, Obama needs to understand a little better how God operates, and how God speaks through people, good things and bad. I think After Obama was elected as President, I thought the public message that the Russian President Dmitry Medvedev sent out to Obama was funny.

Basically, without quoting Medvedev too much, he told Obama that the Russian people have no problems with the American people, and that Russians are not born out of the womb hating Americans. That part I thought was funny, because many Americans actually think that way. They think most of the world hates them, and hates them for no reason. That is one main reason why Bush was elected there twice.

Medvedev said something about mutual respect, which is another thing Americans have a problem with. However, the Medvedev statement not having inborn hate really got my humor. It is a shame he had to expose something that is true in such a statement like that. When he said that, that was the statement of the day.

Leaders from around the world, was so glad to see Bush go. Many people from around the world are believing that, with Obama, it is a new day of respect and peace for everybody. The people in some countries who do not like Americans, do not like them because America do not like them back. In other words, the hatred and disrespect stems mostly from America's conservative base and conservative media, first, towards other countries through elected American leaders by the American people.

Such was the case with the past 8 years of Bush. With that said, the now U.S. President Obama needs to be careful, not to act like Bush, which he is showing signs now of doing. Obama should have read Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's congratulations letter and personally contacted Ahmadinejad back.

It is not a sin to let him know that you received his letter, if you actually did. Especially if the person seemingly did nothing personal to you or your country.

You as President really have an obligation to speak to the man, now, during this time while everything is okay, and not disrespectfully ignore him causing tension to build.

That is evil and American in the worst way, and God sees that. This is one of the worst things you can do to a person is ignore them, when they did nothing to hurt you, but just try to communicate or say hello.

If there is something wrong with Ahmadinejad you are not helping the situation by ignoring him. If you quit letting evil people in power whisper in your ears and control your brain, you might just help the man and change things for the better.

Again, I want to go into some things about Iran, probably after this series soon. One thing, I want to say and will repeat when I talk about Iran is that there are many people in Iran who like the American people, and do NOT want to be at war with America or Israel. I will go into that at a later time.

I am going to have to extend this series to one or two more parts. When I go into talking about U.S. Vice-President Joseph Biden, I will have alot of ground to cover. So, I will do a part 9 on a statement by Biden and hopefully finish with Hillary and discussing palin.