Hello World:
Today I am going to mention about two other countries that need to be attacked of sorts other than Gaddafi and Libya. I mentioned before about China. China is one of the worst countries who are very oppressive towards its citizens and visitors. They are very oppressive and suppressive towards Christians.
The Chinese goverment suppresses freedom of speech, freedom of movement, especially for the different working classes, and freedom of assembly. The Chinese government gets into a lot of people's business. They want to know nearly everything you do. In other words, you have very little privacy.
If something is not right, they will detain you in jail for ANY given length of time of their choosing. They are very oppressive and torturous to prisoners. If it appears you are not in line with the rules of their government, you are often pronounced guilty before having fair trial and defense. Your defense is given very little time to prepare and is often hampered.
The Peoples Republic of China, or PRC is a government that is very nosey, extremely intrusive, highly oppressive and who forces its citizens to serve it as a god. However, from some information I obtained, the United States is HEAVILY IN FINANCIAL DEBT TO CHINA. That is a major reason why China is not MILITARILY CHALLENGED on its' LACK OF human rights. China also has a bigger and more formidable military than Libya. China has recently rounded up known dessenters, based on all the unrest happening in the Middle East and Africa. The Chinese government has also recently told the UN/I.C. to stay out of its' affairs. I believe the UN/I.C. will do just that.
Another country I want to mention here is Mexico. If there is any country that the United States military should be ordered to invade, and justly so, it would have to be Mexico. Mexico has major drug cartels or gangs that have been committing massive killings against mexican citizens, the mexican government and visitors from the United States. Some of the killings by the Mexican drug gangs have spilled over the border into the southern United States.
There had to be a major crackdown in the United States against gun stores selling guns to the drug gangs in Mexico. The killings by drug gangs in Mexico are some of the worst committed anywhere. There have been reports and images of headless bodies hanging from bridges in Mexico. Innocent people are ambushed while driving, minding their business and gunned down. Churches are being busted into and Christians robbed and slaughtered in church services.
Government officials are threatened and killed. Just recently, the new chief of police in a town, had to resign and sneak and escape to the Unted States for asylum, because she was threatened and targeted. The drug gangs are taking over the country of Mexico from the government and are stronger than the Mexican government and its military.
The Mexican government right at this time is weak. So, it is one giant mess in Mexico that needs to end. The best way to end all the violence in Mexico is a full scale military invasion and assault against the drug gangs. Someone, very strong, needs to go into Mexico and go house to house, car to car and root out and exterminate the murderers.
All guns and weapons need to be confiscated, because too many people have died in that country. It has been a horrific bloodbath in Mexico by the drug gangs for several years now. That is the bloodbath that you Obama, and you Hillary really need to be stopping. It is that kind of situation such as Mexico, that a country needs a dictator or someone who will rule with a iron fist. That is why Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, who is elected, is so important.
If it was not for leaders like Chavez, the whole of South America might be taken over and consumed by drugs, violence and murder. Another thing, just because a country does not elect its leaders every 4 years does not make that country's leader a dictator. You can have dictators elected by the people for terms of 4 or 8 years too. Just ask former dictator Bush Jr.
I got news for you "international community". Jesus Christ will reign over the entire planet earth for over a thousand years, and then afterwards, His kingdom will last forever. So, you will not get to vote Him out of office. Another thing, God rules the universe, and you have no way to stop that. You can call Jesus Christ and God dictators if you want, but your international military intervention can do NOTHING to stop Jesus Christ or God. You can not vote God out of office and you can not bomb or nuke Him out of office. Yahweh, Jehovah God rules and reigns over all forever.
I want to quickly discuss situation in Japan. I think it is possible that part of God's endtime judgements on mankind is related to the recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan. The nuclear fallout taking place in Japan is a man-made situation. I believe there are some decent people in Japan, and so again, we should help the people in Japan. I do believe there is a much bigger earthquake, than what occurred in Japan, coming.
In regards to that nuclear disaster in Japan, I would have to say that that is incentive for all countries, not some, but all countries to PEACEFULLY AGREE to eliminate, dissolve or terminate the use of nuclear power. There is too much risk to human health and to nature itself. The dangers of radiation from nuclear power, and the high maintenance of housing the rods and core and failures of housing in a disaster event far outweigh the benefits.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
The Libya Situation And Colonel Gaddafi(Qadhafi) Part 6
Hello World:
A few posts back I mentioned possible connections to the Libyan rebels and Al-Qaeda. I also mentioned I wanted to discuss Egypt again. So, I want to address those issues today. First, I am not quite sure if Al-Qaeda is secretly involved with the rebels in Libya. The possibility is there, and the rebels will probably never admit it, especially with the help they are getting from the U.S. and UN who are enemies to Al-Qaeda.
It can be noted that, as I previously mentioned, that since or around 2008, Gaddafi was helping the U.S. and other countries weed out and fight Al-Qaeda. It should also be noted that the government of the country of Yemen, where there is also major protest and civil unrest, has also helped the U.S. and other countries fight Al-Qaeda.
I also saw some reports that Israel may also be involved in helping Gaddafi by paying mercenaries from other countries, several hundreds of dollars, to fight against the rebels. I read that that is why when Gaddafi announced a ceasefire, it appeared his supporters were still advancing and fighting against the rebels; because Israel was possibly running that show.
That sounds kind of odd that Israel might be secretly involved, but there are rumors that Hezbollah, another terror group, that is a enemy to Israel, is also helping the Libyan rebels. However, any Israeli involvement could also be just a setup to make Gaddafi look like a untrustworthy butcher. However, right now those are all UNCONFIRMED reports, NOT facts; but you do not always know how people can be crafty or deceptive and manipulative behind the scenes.
Again, the United States is guilty in getting involved against Gaddafi's Libya. The international community is guilty in getting involved against Gaddafi's Libya. Are The U.S. and I.C. helping terror groups such as Al-Qaeda in Libya, by helping the rebels? Was there secret or covert operations performed by the U.S. and British to start the uprising months before it happened in Libya? If the reports about Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah helping the rebels do turn out to be fact and exposed to the U.S. public, with the U.S. helping and covertly arming those terror groups, Obama's re-election in 2012 possibly could be in jeopardy, and Hillary and the rest of Obama's administration could be looked at, historically, as a disgrace.
Just because the U. S. and I. C. has the bigger guns and more advanced military hardware and software equipment with precision satelite imagery from the air, and is winning does not mean they are right or they are the good guys. It just means they have the bigger and the best guns to enforce their will on whomever they please. Gaddafi is just not strong enough militarily to fight back.
People need to remember that Saddam Hussein made the same mistake. Compared to the I.C., Gaddafi can not even put up a fight against the U.S. and I.C. Now that is really bad. If there has to be a fight, I kind of like to see a good fight, or some competition. Although Gaddafi is still winning against the rebels, despite the airstrike beating he took from the U.S. and I.C.
A lot of people complain about the U.S. and the UN or the I. C. imperialistic behavior, but these countries such as Libya can not even make it a really good fight, and really do some damage. Another thing, I. C., if your mission is not to kill Gaddafi, then what was that with the two missiles that struck his "compound". You could not be sending those missiles at him to tickle him, could you? Those missiles were meant to kill Gaddafi. Another thing, this idea and statements of not taking sides, when you are clearly helping the rebels is a lie. So, those are two big lies by you, I.C., U.N., U.S.
I want to insert in here that in some cases, one leader or a autocrat is necessary. Many in the west term them dictators, like it is always a bad thing. The dictators are really bad when they possess oil and water in their country. If someone did research into types of government, it can be found that there are many, many forms or types of governments. As an example, democratic, oligarchy, republic, socialism, communism, aristocratic, monarch, empire, etc, etc. They vary between the rule of many, the rule of few, the rule of a select few, and the rule of one.
A democratic form of government may not necessarily be the best form of government for everybody. It is possible for people to have equality and freedom under other forms of government, besides a democratic one. It comes down to who makes the decisions, and what KIND of decisions are made. So, a Gaddafi-led government should be considered autocratic.
Going back to Egypt again, still at this point, I do not trust those protesters. Now in Egypt, during the protest, a female American reporter, according to the reports suffered, a severe and SUSTAINED SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BEATING by MALE PROTESTERS IN EGYPT. That is not a light thing, and because of that incident to that American reporter, I BELIEVE all the MALE EGYPTIAN PROTESTERS, NOT ALL EGYPTIANS, NOT ALL EGYPTIAN MALES, AND NOT THE WOMEN, but ALL the MALE EGYPTIAN PROTESTERS IN THE STREETS SHOULD BE BOMBED OR KILLED, IF THEY DO NOT GIVE UP THE MULTIPLE MEN WHO SEXUALLY ASSAULTED AND BEAT THAT WOMAN.
By the way, it was Egyptian women who came to the female American reporter's aid, and helped her. Those protesters in Egypt needed to be interrogated, and if people act like or pretend that they do not know and do not talk, then they should die. Another thing over there in Egypt, Christians are still being murdered, and church buildings are being vandalized and broken apart; and the Egyptian police and military are doing NOTHING about it, and are looking the other way.
So, I thought people should know that, about those so-called freedom-fighting, democracy advocates in Egypt, who are a bunch of RAPISTS AND MURDERERS. You are NOT free to act a fool. You are NOT free to grab women on the street and sexually violate them.
Generally speaking without giving all of the details, if it was up to me, a lot of Egyptian men would have DIED shortly after that SUSTAINED sexual assault and beating of that female American reporter.
A few posts back I mentioned possible connections to the Libyan rebels and Al-Qaeda. I also mentioned I wanted to discuss Egypt again. So, I want to address those issues today. First, I am not quite sure if Al-Qaeda is secretly involved with the rebels in Libya. The possibility is there, and the rebels will probably never admit it, especially with the help they are getting from the U.S. and UN who are enemies to Al-Qaeda.
It can be noted that, as I previously mentioned, that since or around 2008, Gaddafi was helping the U.S. and other countries weed out and fight Al-Qaeda. It should also be noted that the government of the country of Yemen, where there is also major protest and civil unrest, has also helped the U.S. and other countries fight Al-Qaeda.
I also saw some reports that Israel may also be involved in helping Gaddafi by paying mercenaries from other countries, several hundreds of dollars, to fight against the rebels. I read that that is why when Gaddafi announced a ceasefire, it appeared his supporters were still advancing and fighting against the rebels; because Israel was possibly running that show.
That sounds kind of odd that Israel might be secretly involved, but there are rumors that Hezbollah, another terror group, that is a enemy to Israel, is also helping the Libyan rebels. However, any Israeli involvement could also be just a setup to make Gaddafi look like a untrustworthy butcher. However, right now those are all UNCONFIRMED reports, NOT facts; but you do not always know how people can be crafty or deceptive and manipulative behind the scenes.
Again, the United States is guilty in getting involved against Gaddafi's Libya. The international community is guilty in getting involved against Gaddafi's Libya. Are The U.S. and I.C. helping terror groups such as Al-Qaeda in Libya, by helping the rebels? Was there secret or covert operations performed by the U.S. and British to start the uprising months before it happened in Libya? If the reports about Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah helping the rebels do turn out to be fact and exposed to the U.S. public, with the U.S. helping and covertly arming those terror groups, Obama's re-election in 2012 possibly could be in jeopardy, and Hillary and the rest of Obama's administration could be looked at, historically, as a disgrace.
Just because the U. S. and I. C. has the bigger guns and more advanced military hardware and software equipment with precision satelite imagery from the air, and is winning does not mean they are right or they are the good guys. It just means they have the bigger and the best guns to enforce their will on whomever they please. Gaddafi is just not strong enough militarily to fight back.
People need to remember that Saddam Hussein made the same mistake. Compared to the I.C., Gaddafi can not even put up a fight against the U.S. and I.C. Now that is really bad. If there has to be a fight, I kind of like to see a good fight, or some competition. Although Gaddafi is still winning against the rebels, despite the airstrike beating he took from the U.S. and I.C.
A lot of people complain about the U.S. and the UN or the I. C. imperialistic behavior, but these countries such as Libya can not even make it a really good fight, and really do some damage. Another thing, I. C., if your mission is not to kill Gaddafi, then what was that with the two missiles that struck his "compound". You could not be sending those missiles at him to tickle him, could you? Those missiles were meant to kill Gaddafi. Another thing, this idea and statements of not taking sides, when you are clearly helping the rebels is a lie. So, those are two big lies by you, I.C., U.N., U.S.
I want to insert in here that in some cases, one leader or a autocrat is necessary. Many in the west term them dictators, like it is always a bad thing. The dictators are really bad when they possess oil and water in their country. If someone did research into types of government, it can be found that there are many, many forms or types of governments. As an example, democratic, oligarchy, republic, socialism, communism, aristocratic, monarch, empire, etc, etc. They vary between the rule of many, the rule of few, the rule of a select few, and the rule of one.
A democratic form of government may not necessarily be the best form of government for everybody. It is possible for people to have equality and freedom under other forms of government, besides a democratic one. It comes down to who makes the decisions, and what KIND of decisions are made. So, a Gaddafi-led government should be considered autocratic.
Going back to Egypt again, still at this point, I do not trust those protesters. Now in Egypt, during the protest, a female American reporter, according to the reports suffered, a severe and SUSTAINED SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BEATING by MALE PROTESTERS IN EGYPT. That is not a light thing, and because of that incident to that American reporter, I BELIEVE all the MALE EGYPTIAN PROTESTERS, NOT ALL EGYPTIANS, NOT ALL EGYPTIAN MALES, AND NOT THE WOMEN, but ALL the MALE EGYPTIAN PROTESTERS IN THE STREETS SHOULD BE BOMBED OR KILLED, IF THEY DO NOT GIVE UP THE MULTIPLE MEN WHO SEXUALLY ASSAULTED AND BEAT THAT WOMAN.
By the way, it was Egyptian women who came to the female American reporter's aid, and helped her. Those protesters in Egypt needed to be interrogated, and if people act like or pretend that they do not know and do not talk, then they should die. Another thing over there in Egypt, Christians are still being murdered, and church buildings are being vandalized and broken apart; and the Egyptian police and military are doing NOTHING about it, and are looking the other way.
So, I thought people should know that, about those so-called freedom-fighting, democracy advocates in Egypt, who are a bunch of RAPISTS AND MURDERERS. You are NOT free to act a fool. You are NOT free to grab women on the street and sexually violate them.
Generally speaking without giving all of the details, if it was up to me, a lot of Egyptian men would have DIED shortly after that SUSTAINED sexual assault and beating of that female American reporter.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
The Libya Situation And Colonel Gaddafi(Qadhafi) Part 5
Hello World:
Two more posts coming after today's, to complete this Libya/Gaddafi series here, and maybe have follow-ups later on down the road. This is part 5 on Libya-Gaddafi. I want to very quickly mention that I was having trouble with my line breaks between paragraphs in compose mode in post editor.
I know some other people reported having the same problems, which causes all the paragraphs to run together. However, I learned that Blogger has upgraded the post editor. I was able to go into Settings, in basic; then went all the way down under global settings to select post editor, and I chose updated post editor, and made the necessary adjustments in my post options on the bottom of my posting page. So, everything works fine now.
I did a general review of the relationship history between the country of Libya and Italy dating back to around 1911. In doing that, I found some thing interesting about imperialism and air bombings back in 1911. Also, that relationship shows Gaddafi coming on the scene, in 1969, and leading a revolt of real independence from Italy and kicking Italians out of Libya. Afterwhich, the Italian government apologizes, and Gaddafi establishes diplomatic relations with Italy and conducts several business ventures with Italy. In other words, Italy became business partners with Libya with Gaddafi in power.
What we have going on over there today is a type of antichristic imperialism by the I. C. Now I would like to repeat with more details specifically what these rebels should have done. They should have first chosen a leader or formulated representatives of their cause. Next, they should have documented complaints on paper and formulated a plan of reforms on paper. Then what they could have done was send Gaddafi a copy of the complaints and reforms, and possibly send the UN a copy or send a copy to other countries, and saying this is who we are, and this is what we would like to do, to make changes in Libya, peacefully.
In doing that with the copies, they would have had witnesses to confirm that their motives are peaceful, and witnesses to be on the alert for possible foul play by Gaddafi. Then after that, the leader or representatives of the rebels can then ask to go and peacefully meet with Gaddafi's government to DISCUSS reforms that they want. If Gaddafi refuses outright to meet, or makes unreasonable threats or commits foul play against any of those representatives, then the rebels can plan a more aggressive or violent approach.
However, I want to add, that given the current climate of other protests and civil unrest in the region, Gaddafi would have probably been more inclined to listen to the rebels, and sit down with their representatives to talk and consider changes, if they had of gone the organized route that I am explaining.
THEN, BEFORE THEY DO ANYTHING VIOLENTLY AFTER DIPLOMACY FAILS, AND IF THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE OUTMANNED AND OUTGUNNED, THOSE REBELS NEED TO GO TO THE UN OR INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OR SOME SUPPOSED FRIENDS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES "FIRST", BEFORE CREATING VIOLENCE AND SAY LOOK, WE HAVE TRIED PEACEFUL DIPLOMACY WITH GADDAFI, THAT DID NOT WORK. SO, NOW WE NEED TO BE A LITTLE MORE RADICAL OR EXTREME OR VIOLENT TO MAKE CHANGES. HOWEVER, BEFORE WE DO THAT OR GO THAT ROUTE, WILL YOU, UNITED NATIONS, I. C. OR FRIENDS OF DEMOCRACY HELP US BY PROVIDING MILITARY SUPPORT. Then they proceed from there.
They need to DOCUMENT as much as possible. Again, they document their complaints against Gaddafi. They also make sure they are not ignorant of what he is capable of doing. So, to me all of those above steps make sense. People should plan those things and organize properly, and show good reason for doing what they are going to do. However, it appears those rebels did not do all of that. Instead they did the opposite.
Like I said before, they copy-cated from other protests from around the region. The rebels did things the wrong way, and then want to cry and play that "innocent victim/civilian" role because they were losing to Gaddafi and getting killed, and the antichristic international community fell for that garbage.
YOU REBELS ARE ENEMY COMBATANTS. WHETHER YOU ARE RIGHT OR WRONG IN YOUR CAUSE, you have to call it like it is. YOU HAVE GONE FROM CITIZEN TO ENEMY, PERIOD! That is what happens to a lot of people who do not plan, are not organized and live stupidly; they get killed. They get themselves and other people, who are innocent, around them killed, and it is nobody's fault but their own, the rebels.
Two more posts coming after today's, to complete this Libya/Gaddafi series here, and maybe have follow-ups later on down the road. This is part 5 on Libya-Gaddafi. I want to very quickly mention that I was having trouble with my line breaks between paragraphs in compose mode in post editor.
I know some other people reported having the same problems, which causes all the paragraphs to run together. However, I learned that Blogger has upgraded the post editor. I was able to go into Settings, in basic; then went all the way down under global settings to select post editor, and I chose updated post editor, and made the necessary adjustments in my post options on the bottom of my posting page. So, everything works fine now.
I did a general review of the relationship history between the country of Libya and Italy dating back to around 1911. In doing that, I found some thing interesting about imperialism and air bombings back in 1911. Also, that relationship shows Gaddafi coming on the scene, in 1969, and leading a revolt of real independence from Italy and kicking Italians out of Libya. Afterwhich, the Italian government apologizes, and Gaddafi establishes diplomatic relations with Italy and conducts several business ventures with Italy. In other words, Italy became business partners with Libya with Gaddafi in power.
What we have going on over there today is a type of antichristic imperialism by the I. C. Now I would like to repeat with more details specifically what these rebels should have done. They should have first chosen a leader or formulated representatives of their cause. Next, they should have documented complaints on paper and formulated a plan of reforms on paper. Then what they could have done was send Gaddafi a copy of the complaints and reforms, and possibly send the UN a copy or send a copy to other countries, and saying this is who we are, and this is what we would like to do, to make changes in Libya, peacefully.
In doing that with the copies, they would have had witnesses to confirm that their motives are peaceful, and witnesses to be on the alert for possible foul play by Gaddafi. Then after that, the leader or representatives of the rebels can then ask to go and peacefully meet with Gaddafi's government to DISCUSS reforms that they want. If Gaddafi refuses outright to meet, or makes unreasonable threats or commits foul play against any of those representatives, then the rebels can plan a more aggressive or violent approach.
However, I want to add, that given the current climate of other protests and civil unrest in the region, Gaddafi would have probably been more inclined to listen to the rebels, and sit down with their representatives to talk and consider changes, if they had of gone the organized route that I am explaining.
THEN, BEFORE THEY DO ANYTHING VIOLENTLY AFTER DIPLOMACY FAILS, AND IF THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE OUTMANNED AND OUTGUNNED, THOSE REBELS NEED TO GO TO THE UN OR INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OR SOME SUPPOSED FRIENDS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES "FIRST", BEFORE CREATING VIOLENCE AND SAY LOOK, WE HAVE TRIED PEACEFUL DIPLOMACY WITH GADDAFI, THAT DID NOT WORK. SO, NOW WE NEED TO BE A LITTLE MORE RADICAL OR EXTREME OR VIOLENT TO MAKE CHANGES. HOWEVER, BEFORE WE DO THAT OR GO THAT ROUTE, WILL YOU, UNITED NATIONS, I. C. OR FRIENDS OF DEMOCRACY HELP US BY PROVIDING MILITARY SUPPORT. Then they proceed from there.
They need to DOCUMENT as much as possible. Again, they document their complaints against Gaddafi. They also make sure they are not ignorant of what he is capable of doing. So, to me all of those above steps make sense. People should plan those things and organize properly, and show good reason for doing what they are going to do. However, it appears those rebels did not do all of that. Instead they did the opposite.
Like I said before, they copy-cated from other protests from around the region. The rebels did things the wrong way, and then want to cry and play that "innocent victim/civilian" role because they were losing to Gaddafi and getting killed, and the antichristic international community fell for that garbage.
YOU REBELS ARE ENEMY COMBATANTS. WHETHER YOU ARE RIGHT OR WRONG IN YOUR CAUSE, you have to call it like it is. YOU HAVE GONE FROM CITIZEN TO ENEMY, PERIOD! That is what happens to a lot of people who do not plan, are not organized and live stupidly; they get killed. They get themselves and other people, who are innocent, around them killed, and it is nobody's fault but their own, the rebels.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
The Libya Situation And Colonel Gaddafi(Qadhafi) Part 4
Hello World:
Back to discussing Libya. In talking in favor of Colonel Muammer Gaddafi, I want to state that I am NOT exactly a fan or some great supporter of him or his policies. I do not know for sure if he did the right thing in his coupe d etat, when he came to power back in 1969. Although there is evidence that suggest, Gaddafi actually freed the Libyan people from Italian imperialism. So, I am looking at today's events to see what information makes sense by God.
First of all, the main complaint from a lot of people is that Gaddafi is wrong, because he is killing his own people. I have to disagree with that complaint. The reason there is that once the Libyan people or SOME groups of the Libyan people rebelled or revolted against the country's leader Gaddafi, they no longer are his people. They the rebels have started a VIOLENT CIVIL WAR to overthrow Gaddafi, possibly killing Gaddafi; and in doing so, they, the rebels drew the first blood. So, they have to face the consequences.
As I said, before, during my War and Passion series, the Libyan rebels violently provoked Gaddafi, he did not up and start killing the rebels for no reason. It would have been different if they had peacefully protested, and he started shooting and bombing peaceful and unarmed demonstrators. That is not the case there.
The first thing I saw, was the rebels crowding certain towns, shouting and throwing rocks, bottles, starting fires and tearing up the towns. They were doing what happened in Tunisia and Egypt. That is the first images you usually see with those protest, is people start from the very BEGINNING throwing rocks at the police, and creating human road blocks, to stop ordinary business.
I have yet to see, in any of those protest, sensible representatives coming to meet with government leaders, to TRY to present a dialogue FIRST or bring some sensible demands to the governments in WRITING FIRST. Where is the documentation to start change. What IDEAS FOR CHANGE do you have? Lets sit down and talk about it for starters. I have not seen that.
I am not inside these countries, like Libya, but the first thing I see is crowds of people, fires and rock throwing. In Libya some of the military defected to the protestors side. So, in Libya it went from human blockades, fires and rock throwing, to shooting bullets and driving tanks and anti-aircraft batteries at the goverment.
After you first try to sensibly sit down and meet with the government leaders to negotiate changes, and the government ignores you, laughs at you, or blows you off as unimportant, only then do you turn to a possible violent protest. However, even still you do not have to become violent. You can leave the country.
You also do not have to leave, but can raise up a civil opposition. However, in doing that, you as the opposition must understand that by attempting the outright overthrow of an established government in your own country, there are risk involved. The greatest risk being that you create CIVIL WAR, and people will get hurt and people will die. So, as a rebel you have to understand that, and be prepared for that.
Also, I want to say this, and let me clarify something, being opposed to the government and or Gaddafi, and wanting change, freedom, equality, better pubic services, etc in this case is not necessarily wrong; but it is how you go about protesting from the start in a animalisic and violent behavor that is wrong. If the government does not listen then fine, do what you have to do. However, I saw in a news report were Gaddafi was trying to reach out and negotiate with the rebels in one of the eastern towns of Libya, but the rebels rejected that. I do not know if that is true, but I heard the report, and I am reported that.
Another thing about the rebel uprising in Libya is the Libyan people are "copy-cating" what the people in Tunisia and Egypt had done. Basically, IN PRINCIPLE their way of protesting to try to overthrow Gaddafi is flawed. The Libyan people have become a product of the saying "monkey see, monkey do" because that is what the other crowd did. So, lets follow the "regional crowd of oppsition", because they must be right, right?
The Libyan protests do not look like protests for human rights and freedom, but based upon the fact the there are protest in other countries. Then you got countries like the U.S. that do not have a clue about which side to take. Then which ever way the "winds of ungodliness blows, they decide to follow, then the U.N. follows them, and nobody knows what is right. I have to have a part 5 on this, and somewhere in there I need to try to go back and say some things or tear into EGYPT'S FREEDOM FIGHTING RAPISTS AND THE ONGOING PROTESTORS WHO ARE KILLING CHRISTIANS over there.
Back to discussing Libya. In talking in favor of Colonel Muammer Gaddafi, I want to state that I am NOT exactly a fan or some great supporter of him or his policies. I do not know for sure if he did the right thing in his coupe d etat, when he came to power back in 1969. Although there is evidence that suggest, Gaddafi actually freed the Libyan people from Italian imperialism. So, I am looking at today's events to see what information makes sense by God.
First of all, the main complaint from a lot of people is that Gaddafi is wrong, because he is killing his own people. I have to disagree with that complaint. The reason there is that once the Libyan people or SOME groups of the Libyan people rebelled or revolted against the country's leader Gaddafi, they no longer are his people. They the rebels have started a VIOLENT CIVIL WAR to overthrow Gaddafi, possibly killing Gaddafi; and in doing so, they, the rebels drew the first blood. So, they have to face the consequences.
As I said, before, during my War and Passion series, the Libyan rebels violently provoked Gaddafi, he did not up and start killing the rebels for no reason. It would have been different if they had peacefully protested, and he started shooting and bombing peaceful and unarmed demonstrators. That is not the case there.
The first thing I saw, was the rebels crowding certain towns, shouting and throwing rocks, bottles, starting fires and tearing up the towns. They were doing what happened in Tunisia and Egypt. That is the first images you usually see with those protest, is people start from the very BEGINNING throwing rocks at the police, and creating human road blocks, to stop ordinary business.
I have yet to see, in any of those protest, sensible representatives coming to meet with government leaders, to TRY to present a dialogue FIRST or bring some sensible demands to the governments in WRITING FIRST. Where is the documentation to start change. What IDEAS FOR CHANGE do you have? Lets sit down and talk about it for starters. I have not seen that.
I am not inside these countries, like Libya, but the first thing I see is crowds of people, fires and rock throwing. In Libya some of the military defected to the protestors side. So, in Libya it went from human blockades, fires and rock throwing, to shooting bullets and driving tanks and anti-aircraft batteries at the goverment.
After you first try to sensibly sit down and meet with the government leaders to negotiate changes, and the government ignores you, laughs at you, or blows you off as unimportant, only then do you turn to a possible violent protest. However, even still you do not have to become violent. You can leave the country.
You also do not have to leave, but can raise up a civil opposition. However, in doing that, you as the opposition must understand that by attempting the outright overthrow of an established government in your own country, there are risk involved. The greatest risk being that you create CIVIL WAR, and people will get hurt and people will die. So, as a rebel you have to understand that, and be prepared for that.
Also, I want to say this, and let me clarify something, being opposed to the government and or Gaddafi, and wanting change, freedom, equality, better pubic services, etc in this case is not necessarily wrong; but it is how you go about protesting from the start in a animalisic and violent behavor that is wrong. If the government does not listen then fine, do what you have to do. However, I saw in a news report were Gaddafi was trying to reach out and negotiate with the rebels in one of the eastern towns of Libya, but the rebels rejected that. I do not know if that is true, but I heard the report, and I am reported that.
Another thing about the rebel uprising in Libya is the Libyan people are "copy-cating" what the people in Tunisia and Egypt had done. Basically, IN PRINCIPLE their way of protesting to try to overthrow Gaddafi is flawed. The Libyan people have become a product of the saying "monkey see, monkey do" because that is what the other crowd did. So, lets follow the "regional crowd of oppsition", because they must be right, right?
The Libyan protests do not look like protests for human rights and freedom, but based upon the fact the there are protest in other countries. Then you got countries like the U.S. that do not have a clue about which side to take. Then which ever way the "winds of ungodliness blows, they decide to follow, then the U.N. follows them, and nobody knows what is right. I have to have a part 5 on this, and somewhere in there I need to try to go back and say some things or tear into EGYPT'S FREEDOM FIGHTING RAPISTS AND THE ONGOING PROTESTORS WHO ARE KILLING CHRISTIANS over there.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
The Libya Situation And Colonel Gaddafi(Qadhafi) Part 3
Hello World:
In the last post, I talked about how the United States provoked Gaddafi in the 1970s and 1980s, and as a result a lot of innocent people were killed. If Gaddafi truly did order those commercal plane bombings, that was wrong; because if you have a dispute with another country's government and military, and you feel the need to retaliate, you need to retaliate against that country's military personnel and equipment that was sent to attack you. You, generally, do NOT want to target unarmed civilians from the other country.
There is a argument that can be made for going after civilians, because they can be responsible for electing the people in power who cause the conflicts with other countries. A country's leader can be just as evil, hateful and stupid as the people who elected them and whom they represent. Another way of putting it is that, evil civilians can elect evil government leaders. So, NO, NOT ALL civilians are innocent. Also, PURPOSELY not caring or PURPOSELY being ignorant of what your government leaders or representatives are doing is NOT innocent.
If Gaddafi was, as mentioned before, really behind the Pan Am 103 and France Plane bombings, and I mean IF, then he should HAVE BEEN punished A LONG TIME AGO. He can be forgiven, but still should be punished, in some way, for those specific passenger plane deaths. In addition to that, I believe that NO amount of money paid can make up for or replace the lost life of a loved one or relative.
As mentioned before, Gaddafi did suffer the lost of a supposed adopted daughter; and seperately, in 1998, in surviving one of several assassination attempts by militants, of his own religion of Islam, Gaddafi's favorite female bodyguard was killed in his arms while protecting him.
In 2003, Gaddafi was convinced to renounce terrorism and to stop pursuit of a nuclear weapons program. He has been helping countries, including the United States, fight terrorism for close to eight years now. I have a report back from September 2008, where former U.S. Secretary of State Rice, serving under then U.S. President Bush Jr., was meeting Gaddafi in Libya, to discuss strategy against Al-Qaeda. Also during which time, there was several U.S. companies trying to get billions of dollars in contracts tied to oil prduction in Libya.
It is also known that Libya, under Gaddafi's rule, supplied around two-percent of the world's oil production, before the 2011 uprising of the rebels. Also, before all of the chaos in Libya, and in recent attempts to overthrow and kill Gaddafi, and him retaliating against the rebels, etc, etc, Libya was on the verge of gaining additional military contracts with Russia.
If Gaddafi is really a cold-blooded killer, then you, United States and International Community, are not suppose to embrace him, do business with him, and allow him to travel freely for over 20 years, and then after all those years of business dealing and supposed friendships, an unclear civil war arises in his country, where he may possibly be in the right about defending his authority, that you allowed and his country's citizens allowed, that now you, U.S. and I.C. decides he is ALL OF A SUDDEN the new evil on the planet and needs to go.
In relation with Gaddafi's disputes with the United States government that I mentioned previously. I believe over the years, Gaddafi has had to fight off multiple covert operations from the U.S. and OTHER governments agencies to take him out of power and kill him. Also, it appears that Gaddafi has actually or seemingly tried to change his image or appearance that he is a bad guy, by making restitutions to the Pan Am 103 and french Airline victim's families, meeting with them, renouncing terror, and stopping nuclear bomb making. Those are signs of a country's leader trying to change by doing the right things.
So, it can be seen, that from at least 2008 up to the beginning of this 2011, that no known major groups or government leaders were calling for Gaddafi to leave. He attended the UN meetings in the U.S. with no prblems. He was doing other business in the U.S. recenty with no problem. He had not lost any legitimacy the past three years. Back in December of 2010, there were no reports or complaints about him killing anybody and no there were no humanitarian crisis going on in Libya. There were no willing defections within his government. It was all business as usual with Gaddafi and world leaders.
In the last post, I talked about how the United States provoked Gaddafi in the 1970s and 1980s, and as a result a lot of innocent people were killed. If Gaddafi truly did order those commercal plane bombings, that was wrong; because if you have a dispute with another country's government and military, and you feel the need to retaliate, you need to retaliate against that country's military personnel and equipment that was sent to attack you. You, generally, do NOT want to target unarmed civilians from the other country.
There is a argument that can be made for going after civilians, because they can be responsible for electing the people in power who cause the conflicts with other countries. A country's leader can be just as evil, hateful and stupid as the people who elected them and whom they represent. Another way of putting it is that, evil civilians can elect evil government leaders. So, NO, NOT ALL civilians are innocent. Also, PURPOSELY not caring or PURPOSELY being ignorant of what your government leaders or representatives are doing is NOT innocent.
If Gaddafi was, as mentioned before, really behind the Pan Am 103 and France Plane bombings, and I mean IF, then he should HAVE BEEN punished A LONG TIME AGO. He can be forgiven, but still should be punished, in some way, for those specific passenger plane deaths. In addition to that, I believe that NO amount of money paid can make up for or replace the lost life of a loved one or relative.
As mentioned before, Gaddafi did suffer the lost of a supposed adopted daughter; and seperately, in 1998, in surviving one of several assassination attempts by militants, of his own religion of Islam, Gaddafi's favorite female bodyguard was killed in his arms while protecting him.
In 2003, Gaddafi was convinced to renounce terrorism and to stop pursuit of a nuclear weapons program. He has been helping countries, including the United States, fight terrorism for close to eight years now. I have a report back from September 2008, where former U.S. Secretary of State Rice, serving under then U.S. President Bush Jr., was meeting Gaddafi in Libya, to discuss strategy against Al-Qaeda. Also during which time, there was several U.S. companies trying to get billions of dollars in contracts tied to oil prduction in Libya.
It is also known that Libya, under Gaddafi's rule, supplied around two-percent of the world's oil production, before the 2011 uprising of the rebels. Also, before all of the chaos in Libya, and in recent attempts to overthrow and kill Gaddafi, and him retaliating against the rebels, etc, etc, Libya was on the verge of gaining additional military contracts with Russia.
If Gaddafi is really a cold-blooded killer, then you, United States and International Community, are not suppose to embrace him, do business with him, and allow him to travel freely for over 20 years, and then after all those years of business dealing and supposed friendships, an unclear civil war arises in his country, where he may possibly be in the right about defending his authority, that you allowed and his country's citizens allowed, that now you, U.S. and I.C. decides he is ALL OF A SUDDEN the new evil on the planet and needs to go.
In relation with Gaddafi's disputes with the United States government that I mentioned previously. I believe over the years, Gaddafi has had to fight off multiple covert operations from the U.S. and OTHER governments agencies to take him out of power and kill him. Also, it appears that Gaddafi has actually or seemingly tried to change his image or appearance that he is a bad guy, by making restitutions to the Pan Am 103 and french Airline victim's families, meeting with them, renouncing terror, and stopping nuclear bomb making. Those are signs of a country's leader trying to change by doing the right things.
So, it can be seen, that from at least 2008 up to the beginning of this 2011, that no known major groups or government leaders were calling for Gaddafi to leave. He attended the UN meetings in the U.S. with no prblems. He was doing other business in the U.S. recenty with no problem. He had not lost any legitimacy the past three years. Back in December of 2010, there were no reports or complaints about him killing anybody and no there were no humanitarian crisis going on in Libya. There were no willing defections within his government. It was all business as usual with Gaddafi and world leaders.
Friday, April 08, 2011
The Libya Situation And Colonel Gaddafi(Qadhafi) Part 2
Hello World:
Colonel Gaddafi came into power by coupe d'etate, or stroke of state, overthrowing the government, or revolt in 1969. In 1973, Gaddafi claimed a body of water in the Mediteranean Sea, called the Gulf of Sidra, or Gulf of Sirte, Great Sirte, or Khalij Surt, meaning arm of the Mediterranean in Arabic.
The Gulf of Sidra is around 273 miles long from east to west. It is the body of Mediterranean water, that bulges inward along Libya, extending just west of the town of Sirte and between the towns or cities of Bengahzi to Mesrata. It is also a good fishing area. Back in 1973, Gaddafi proclaimed that the Gulf of Sidra to be A "Line of Death", by military action, to any foreign countries crossing through it without permission.
Now, I see that as important, because none of the other African countries laid territorial claim to the Gulf of Sidra, only Libya with Gaddafi. If one look at the Gulf of Sidra, it can be seen that it is right there next to the land of Libya. So, I can understand, as a defense, what Gaddafi was doing, by making that territorial claim, especially after freeing Libya from Italian oppression.
So, ahead of time, Gaddafi gave fair warning to other countries and there militaries. No intelligent foreign government can say they were not warned or did not know, because Gaddafi put the warning out there, and he was not joking or playing around. Gaddafi said somebody crosses that line, somebody dies; and that is exactly what ended up happening. In fact, it can be seen that there were hundreds of somebodies who ended up dying, as I continue to explain below.
Now, it just so happens that the United States government, who resides on the other side of the world, disagreed with Gaddafi's claim, and decided to provoke Gaddafi in 1973. So, hence I want to present a quick timeline of events following below from various reports from my research.
In March 1973, Libyan fighter planes engaged and fired on a U.S. reconnaissance plane OFF THE LIBYAN COAST. The Libyan fighter planes signaled for the U.S. plane to follow them into Libya and land. The U.S. military plane did not follow, but was able to escape, because of the clouds. During the 1980s, there was several conflicts between Libya and the United States; and after 1981, conflicts between Gaddafi and then U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
In September 1980, Libyan fighters shot at another U.S. recon-military plane, but the U.S. did not retaliate. In 1981, U.S. F-14 Tomcat warplanes shot down two Soviet made warplanes of the Libyan air force in the Gulf of Sidra. In April 1986, the U.S. did an all out on purpose naval invasion with three aircraft carriers with over 200 warplanes and nearly 30 warships across the "Line of Death", in the Gulf of Sidra. Following that invasion, during military fighting, two more U.S. planes sunk two Libyan patrol boats killing an unknown number of Libyans. Then in April of 1986, Gaddafi was believed to have ordered a bombing of a German disco that killed two U.S. soldiers, a woman from Turkey and wounding several hundreds of people.
Nearly a week and a half later, in April, the U.S. bombed Gaddafi's home with air strikes, which is believed to have killed Gaddafi's adopted daughter with 15 other civilians. Gaddafi managed to miraculously survive that attack and was actually rescued by one of his sons.
In December 1988, a commercial plane exploded, as the result of terrorism, over Lockerbie, Scotland killing 270 people, 189 of which were Americans. There was another bombing of a French commercial plane over Niger in 1989, which killed 170 people. Both of those attacks on commercial planes were believed to be connected to or ordered by Gaddafi.
There is some unconfirmed reports, that Gaddafi may not have been behind or connected to the Lockerbie Pan Am 103 bombing, but rather someone from a Palestinian group did it, with some motivation from Iran or Syria. There is the possiblity that there was a cover-up by the U.S. and Britain to make Gaddafi look like he was behind the airliner attacks, when he may not have been. However, Gaddafi, at that time refused to cooperate with a UN investigation, and years later Gaddafi has accepted responsibility for the Pan Am 103 Lockerbie plane bombing. He actually met with the families of the victims, and paid those families billions of dollars. It is reported that Gaddafi also paid 31 million dollars to the families of the victims in the French plane bombing. Another report rumors that Gaddafi was blackmailed into accepting responsibilities and making financial restitutions to the victim's families.
Gaddafi was in a back and forth military dispute with the United States government from the 1970s and 1980s, especially in the 80s, as mentioned earlier, with then U.S. President Ronald Reagan, over territory near or right at the Libyan country. There are several things wrong with that on the United States part. The United States has had the attitude, of wanting to be the dominate military power of ALL lands, air and seas since after World War II.
With that attitude, the U.S. feels they can fly their military aircraft over and around or near anybody else's country or airspace without question and without challenge. They also, believe that they can sail their ships in anybody's waters without question and without challenge.
With some country's like Libya, the United States do not even ask for permission to fly or sail through their airspace or territory. They just show up as they feel like it to perform military exercises. That attitude is WRONG and DISRESPECTFUL to other nations.
If the U.S. did not mean any harm to Gaddafi and Libya, and was not spying or being nosey with reconnaisance missions or being provocative with naval aircraft carriers and warplanes, they could have just asked Gaddafi if they could fly exercises near or around his country.
So, it looked like what happened is the U.S. was showing off their military prowess and provoking Gaddafi to his face, and Gaddafi did not like it, and decided to take action against modern day imperialism. Then some innocent people got killed. Then we all of a sudden wonder why did some bad person blow up the disco, or why did some bad person blow up the Pan Am flight 103 and the France commercial planes? Well, it first looks like the United States started all that mess by provoking Gaddafi.
If the United States government would NOT have provoked Gaddafi, minded their own business and was respectful, that disco and those planes may not have been bombed and blown up, and those 440-plus people may still be alive today. In other words, if Colonel Gaddafi truly is found to be responsible for the deaths of the Pan Am 103 and French Airline passengers, then I believe that the United States government could ALSO be responsible for those 440-plus deaths, counting the German Disco, and if not, could possibly be implicated in the cover-up of the real killers.
There needs to be a further investigation into the rocky relationship between the U.S. government and Gaddafi from the 1970s through the 1980s. Also, an investigation needs to be done, to look for wrongful involvement, in the airline bombings, by both the British and United States government for possible isolated covert contacts with some members of terror groups from Iran and Syria.
Another thing, you never hear about another country doing military exercises near or in American airspace or waters. It seems to always be the United States, going on the other side of the world with their military personnel and equipment, mocking and provoking some other country. Then when the other country gets rightfully angry, the U.S. want to make it seem like its the other country's fault, and the U.S. military has the right to do whatever they want, and they are the good guys, and anybody else who challenges them is wrong. NOT!!! God sees that mess, and He knows who started it, and who really is responsible.
Colonel Gaddafi came into power by coupe d'etate, or stroke of state, overthrowing the government, or revolt in 1969. In 1973, Gaddafi claimed a body of water in the Mediteranean Sea, called the Gulf of Sidra, or Gulf of Sirte, Great Sirte, or Khalij Surt, meaning arm of the Mediterranean in Arabic.
The Gulf of Sidra is around 273 miles long from east to west. It is the body of Mediterranean water, that bulges inward along Libya, extending just west of the town of Sirte and between the towns or cities of Bengahzi to Mesrata. It is also a good fishing area. Back in 1973, Gaddafi proclaimed that the Gulf of Sidra to be A "Line of Death", by military action, to any foreign countries crossing through it without permission.
Now, I see that as important, because none of the other African countries laid territorial claim to the Gulf of Sidra, only Libya with Gaddafi. If one look at the Gulf of Sidra, it can be seen that it is right there next to the land of Libya. So, I can understand, as a defense, what Gaddafi was doing, by making that territorial claim, especially after freeing Libya from Italian oppression.
So, ahead of time, Gaddafi gave fair warning to other countries and there militaries. No intelligent foreign government can say they were not warned or did not know, because Gaddafi put the warning out there, and he was not joking or playing around. Gaddafi said somebody crosses that line, somebody dies; and that is exactly what ended up happening. In fact, it can be seen that there were hundreds of somebodies who ended up dying, as I continue to explain below.
Now, it just so happens that the United States government, who resides on the other side of the world, disagreed with Gaddafi's claim, and decided to provoke Gaddafi in 1973. So, hence I want to present a quick timeline of events following below from various reports from my research.
In March 1973, Libyan fighter planes engaged and fired on a U.S. reconnaissance plane OFF THE LIBYAN COAST. The Libyan fighter planes signaled for the U.S. plane to follow them into Libya and land. The U.S. military plane did not follow, but was able to escape, because of the clouds. During the 1980s, there was several conflicts between Libya and the United States; and after 1981, conflicts between Gaddafi and then U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
In September 1980, Libyan fighters shot at another U.S. recon-military plane, but the U.S. did not retaliate. In 1981, U.S. F-14 Tomcat warplanes shot down two Soviet made warplanes of the Libyan air force in the Gulf of Sidra. In April 1986, the U.S. did an all out on purpose naval invasion with three aircraft carriers with over 200 warplanes and nearly 30 warships across the "Line of Death", in the Gulf of Sidra. Following that invasion, during military fighting, two more U.S. planes sunk two Libyan patrol boats killing an unknown number of Libyans. Then in April of 1986, Gaddafi was believed to have ordered a bombing of a German disco that killed two U.S. soldiers, a woman from Turkey and wounding several hundreds of people.
Nearly a week and a half later, in April, the U.S. bombed Gaddafi's home with air strikes, which is believed to have killed Gaddafi's adopted daughter with 15 other civilians. Gaddafi managed to miraculously survive that attack and was actually rescued by one of his sons.
In December 1988, a commercial plane exploded, as the result of terrorism, over Lockerbie, Scotland killing 270 people, 189 of which were Americans. There was another bombing of a French commercial plane over Niger in 1989, which killed 170 people. Both of those attacks on commercial planes were believed to be connected to or ordered by Gaddafi.
There is some unconfirmed reports, that Gaddafi may not have been behind or connected to the Lockerbie Pan Am 103 bombing, but rather someone from a Palestinian group did it, with some motivation from Iran or Syria. There is the possiblity that there was a cover-up by the U.S. and Britain to make Gaddafi look like he was behind the airliner attacks, when he may not have been. However, Gaddafi, at that time refused to cooperate with a UN investigation, and years later Gaddafi has accepted responsibility for the Pan Am 103 Lockerbie plane bombing. He actually met with the families of the victims, and paid those families billions of dollars. It is reported that Gaddafi also paid 31 million dollars to the families of the victims in the French plane bombing. Another report rumors that Gaddafi was blackmailed into accepting responsibilities and making financial restitutions to the victim's families.
Gaddafi was in a back and forth military dispute with the United States government from the 1970s and 1980s, especially in the 80s, as mentioned earlier, with then U.S. President Ronald Reagan, over territory near or right at the Libyan country. There are several things wrong with that on the United States part. The United States has had the attitude, of wanting to be the dominate military power of ALL lands, air and seas since after World War II.
With that attitude, the U.S. feels they can fly their military aircraft over and around or near anybody else's country or airspace without question and without challenge. They also, believe that they can sail their ships in anybody's waters without question and without challenge.
With some country's like Libya, the United States do not even ask for permission to fly or sail through their airspace or territory. They just show up as they feel like it to perform military exercises. That attitude is WRONG and DISRESPECTFUL to other nations.
If the U.S. did not mean any harm to Gaddafi and Libya, and was not spying or being nosey with reconnaisance missions or being provocative with naval aircraft carriers and warplanes, they could have just asked Gaddafi if they could fly exercises near or around his country.
So, it looked like what happened is the U.S. was showing off their military prowess and provoking Gaddafi to his face, and Gaddafi did not like it, and decided to take action against modern day imperialism. Then some innocent people got killed. Then we all of a sudden wonder why did some bad person blow up the disco, or why did some bad person blow up the Pan Am flight 103 and the France commercial planes? Well, it first looks like the United States started all that mess by provoking Gaddafi.
If the United States government would NOT have provoked Gaddafi, minded their own business and was respectful, that disco and those planes may not have been bombed and blown up, and those 440-plus people may still be alive today. In other words, if Colonel Gaddafi truly is found to be responsible for the deaths of the Pan Am 103 and French Airline passengers, then I believe that the United States government could ALSO be responsible for those 440-plus deaths, counting the German Disco, and if not, could possibly be implicated in the cover-up of the real killers.
There needs to be a further investigation into the rocky relationship between the U.S. government and Gaddafi from the 1970s through the 1980s. Also, an investigation needs to be done, to look for wrongful involvement, in the airline bombings, by both the British and United States government for possible isolated covert contacts with some members of terror groups from Iran and Syria.
Another thing, you never hear about another country doing military exercises near or in American airspace or waters. It seems to always be the United States, going on the other side of the world with their military personnel and equipment, mocking and provoking some other country. Then when the other country gets rightfully angry, the U.S. want to make it seem like its the other country's fault, and the U.S. military has the right to do whatever they want, and they are the good guys, and anybody else who challenges them is wrong. NOT!!! God sees that mess, and He knows who started it, and who really is responsible.
Monday, April 04, 2011
The Libya Situation and Colonel Gaddafi(Qadhafi) Part 1
Hello World:
I am trying or attempting to spell Colonel Muammer Gaddafi or Qadhafi's name right here in english. I believe I saw three different spellings, and I am trying not to offend in that. In these posts I think I will go with using Gaddafi. I want to mention to everybody that for most of this month of April 2011, I will be talking or posting mostly about Libya, Gaddafi and the United States and International Community involvement in Libya. That is the plan so far, and could change, but should not at this point. I then plan in early May to discuss another topic on the Rapture.
I have not forgot about Japan. There are people in Japan who need help after the earthquake, tsunami and now nuclear fallout. So, for those who can, reach out and help Japan. I told everybody back in my War and Passion series that I believe Gaddafi is right, and the international community with the United States is wrong. I still believe that. I know that may be shocking to read in the Christian community.
Everything, and I mean everything that I have seen, heard and read from news reports has been anti-Gaddafi and pro-Libyan rebels. So, I have been receiving a lot of bad reports about Gaddafi. The U. S. leaders from President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton looked confused, inexperienced and incompetent in foreign affairs. Hillary talked about enforcing a no-fly zone, like she did not really understand what that means.
The Arab league or the United Arab League recently met and asked the United Nations to enforce a no-fly zone to help the rebels, because they are not man enough to do it themselves. I want to ask the countries that represent the Arab League, besides Qatar, where is your own air force jets and offshore anti-aircraft missiles? Where are your own ground troops that would need to go into and invade Libya? The United Arab League is wrong in their decision to seek a UN no-fly zone.
As I am preparing this post, protests have been breaking out in other parts of the Middle East too, such as Syria, Yemen and Bahrain which I will touch a little on later. In relation to Libya, where was the "international community" during 800,000 ethnic killings in Rwanda back in 1994? Where was this "international community" during the killings in Darfur? What about China, EVERYBODY?
China has probably the worst human rights violations of any country, and there is no "international community" flying over China bombing and invading China to stop that OPPRESSIVE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT to free the Chinese people and visitors to China. So, you international community and the United States government are full of mess. STOP OPPRESSION AND "UNJUST" KILLING EVERYWHERE, and not in selected places where there is OIL and WATER resources for the taking.
Speaking of oppression and unjust killing in different parts of the world, I want to try to mention briefly another country that is not talked about as much. That is the Ivory Coast or Cote D Iviore. The Ivory Coast is located in west Africa. It just so happens, that the President of the Ivory Coast, at the time of this posting is a Christian. His name is Laurent Gbagbo. However, his Presidency is disputed, because by some reports of the last election in 2010, many believe the Muslim challenger Alassane Quattara won, and should now be the real President.
He has people from the Muslim religion who are continuing to challenge his authority there. The United Nations or International Community are also against him. Prior to the last Presidential election in 2010, and onging in the Ivory Coast country, is the killing of Christians by Muslims. So, that is another place where Christians are being killed. President Gbagbo has been on the offensive against the Muslim opposition to defend the lives of Christians in that country.
Back to Libya, I have a surprise revelation about Gaddafi and Libya that many people may not know. I have read and seen two reports about Christians living in Libya. There is a small group of Christians in Libya, although some are considered Catholic, which raises questions to me, because of the Catholic doctrine. However, Christians are believed to make up about 2.5 percent of the total Libyan population.
Well I have read and seen from the Christian World News and the Catholic News Service that Christians have lived in relative peace under Gaddafi's rule. Gaddafi has actually protected Christians from Muslim or Islamic extremist in Libya. The only problem is that the Christians are not allowed to proselytize, or witness to and convert Muslims. However, they are free to preach to other Christians and assemble and worship among themselves.
The reports also mentioned that Gaddafi fought off seperate attacks against Christians by the Muslim brotherhood and Al- Qaeda some time back. Again, Gaddafi was allowing the Christians to live in peace, and the Muslim factions do not like that. That is similar to the Christians' experience in Iraq, when Saddam Hussein was alive and in power there. Then after Iraq was invaded by the U.S. and Saddam Hussein was hung to death, all hell broke loose against Christians, as Christians have been slaughtered over there in Iraq.
So, as soon as Gaddafi gets killed or thrown out of office, due to the U.S. and U.N. helping those rebels, one can see that the Christians over there in Libya could be in trouble. There is an opportunity for the new leaders of libya, after Gaddafi is removed, to go hard after the Christians to kill them.
So, I find those reports on Libya and Gaddafi protecting the Christians in that country very interesting. I want to go into some more things about Colonel Gaddafi in the next post.
I am trying or attempting to spell Colonel Muammer Gaddafi or Qadhafi's name right here in english. I believe I saw three different spellings, and I am trying not to offend in that. In these posts I think I will go with using Gaddafi. I want to mention to everybody that for most of this month of April 2011, I will be talking or posting mostly about Libya, Gaddafi and the United States and International Community involvement in Libya. That is the plan so far, and could change, but should not at this point. I then plan in early May to discuss another topic on the Rapture.
I have not forgot about Japan. There are people in Japan who need help after the earthquake, tsunami and now nuclear fallout. So, for those who can, reach out and help Japan. I told everybody back in my War and Passion series that I believe Gaddafi is right, and the international community with the United States is wrong. I still believe that. I know that may be shocking to read in the Christian community.
Everything, and I mean everything that I have seen, heard and read from news reports has been anti-Gaddafi and pro-Libyan rebels. So, I have been receiving a lot of bad reports about Gaddafi. The U. S. leaders from President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton looked confused, inexperienced and incompetent in foreign affairs. Hillary talked about enforcing a no-fly zone, like she did not really understand what that means.
The Arab league or the United Arab League recently met and asked the United Nations to enforce a no-fly zone to help the rebels, because they are not man enough to do it themselves. I want to ask the countries that represent the Arab League, besides Qatar, where is your own air force jets and offshore anti-aircraft missiles? Where are your own ground troops that would need to go into and invade Libya? The United Arab League is wrong in their decision to seek a UN no-fly zone.
As I am preparing this post, protests have been breaking out in other parts of the Middle East too, such as Syria, Yemen and Bahrain which I will touch a little on later. In relation to Libya, where was the "international community" during 800,000 ethnic killings in Rwanda back in 1994? Where was this "international community" during the killings in Darfur? What about China, EVERYBODY?
China has probably the worst human rights violations of any country, and there is no "international community" flying over China bombing and invading China to stop that OPPRESSIVE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT to free the Chinese people and visitors to China. So, you international community and the United States government are full of mess. STOP OPPRESSION AND "UNJUST" KILLING EVERYWHERE, and not in selected places where there is OIL and WATER resources for the taking.
Speaking of oppression and unjust killing in different parts of the world, I want to try to mention briefly another country that is not talked about as much. That is the Ivory Coast or Cote D Iviore. The Ivory Coast is located in west Africa. It just so happens, that the President of the Ivory Coast, at the time of this posting is a Christian. His name is Laurent Gbagbo. However, his Presidency is disputed, because by some reports of the last election in 2010, many believe the Muslim challenger Alassane Quattara won, and should now be the real President.
He has people from the Muslim religion who are continuing to challenge his authority there. The United Nations or International Community are also against him. Prior to the last Presidential election in 2010, and onging in the Ivory Coast country, is the killing of Christians by Muslims. So, that is another place where Christians are being killed. President Gbagbo has been on the offensive against the Muslim opposition to defend the lives of Christians in that country.
Back to Libya, I have a surprise revelation about Gaddafi and Libya that many people may not know. I have read and seen two reports about Christians living in Libya. There is a small group of Christians in Libya, although some are considered Catholic, which raises questions to me, because of the Catholic doctrine. However, Christians are believed to make up about 2.5 percent of the total Libyan population.
Well I have read and seen from the Christian World News and the Catholic News Service that Christians have lived in relative peace under Gaddafi's rule. Gaddafi has actually protected Christians from Muslim or Islamic extremist in Libya. The only problem is that the Christians are not allowed to proselytize, or witness to and convert Muslims. However, they are free to preach to other Christians and assemble and worship among themselves.
The reports also mentioned that Gaddafi fought off seperate attacks against Christians by the Muslim brotherhood and Al- Qaeda some time back. Again, Gaddafi was allowing the Christians to live in peace, and the Muslim factions do not like that. That is similar to the Christians' experience in Iraq, when Saddam Hussein was alive and in power there. Then after Iraq was invaded by the U.S. and Saddam Hussein was hung to death, all hell broke loose against Christians, as Christians have been slaughtered over there in Iraq.
So, as soon as Gaddafi gets killed or thrown out of office, due to the U.S. and U.N. helping those rebels, one can see that the Christians over there in Libya could be in trouble. There is an opportunity for the new leaders of libya, after Gaddafi is removed, to go hard after the Christians to kill them.
So, I find those reports on Libya and Gaddafi protecting the Christians in that country very interesting. I want to go into some more things about Colonel Gaddafi in the next post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)