Hello World:
The question of should an adopted child be returned or not, should be answered by the following. IDEALLY, under normal circumstances you do not want to have to return a child back to an adoption agency or orphanage.
HOWEVER, In extreme circumstances, if the family, adopting the child, feels they tried everything to help the child become acclimated and loved in the family and the new environment, but was unsuccessful because the child refused to be accepting of the family, then YES, in such situations the adopted child should be returned.
Families, trying to adopt children, especially from other countries, should do an investigation into the adoption agency and orphanage. Also, Families should ask specific questions about the adoption process. Families should go to an adoption agency with their own set of rules, and present those rules to the agency.
One of those rules should be, if the family adopting feels under certain conditions and up to a certain time frame, at the beginning after adoption, that a relationship with the adopted child and the family is absolutely not working, with evidence, that such adopted child will be returned. If the adoption agency or orphanage does not agree, then there should NOT be an adoption with that family.
The adopted child needs to comply with the rules of living with his or her new family. The adopted child can NOT make up their own rules and run the family. The child is NOT in charge and does NOT control the situation.
The adopted child should not have to be watched at ALL times, NOR should the child be plotting to kill the family. That is a situation or circumstance where the adopting family MUST take action to control the situation and keep the family safe.
So again, an adopting family need to have a rule that they have an option with the agency to return that child; in such extreme circumstances when the child is constantly violent and threatening the family. IN COMBINATION, that adoption agency MUST AGREE to that option, BEFORE the adoption takes place. Somebody has to go, when things get really bad as with the family in question, and that somebody has to be the child.
Again, as concerning this adoption story of the Russian boy, it would have been important for the American family that tried unsuccessfully to adopt him, to have had a man in the house to discipline the child. By discipline I mean HIT the boy. Anybody, and that includes family services, who says you should never beat your child in certain circumstances is wrong. They are wrong, because God says different.
In those scriptures I gave back in "Point Two", God specifically says, "if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die." God goes on to say that if you beat him, you will spare his soul from hell. Would you want to spare your child from going to hell for eternity? If it was my child I would.
You do not want to go overboard or to the extreme in beating your child. I pointed out in the previous post of "Point Three", the beatings has to measured, and cause pain for learning purposes to enforce discipline and righteous living, only when the child is acting bad. If you have a good child or a child who is respectful and not harming anybody, or who has the spirit of God in him, and you see that you do not need to beat him or her, then that is a good thing too.
Generally, each child is supposed to learn right from wrong, and that when they do something wrong, they suffer a painful consequence. They also, need to learn, they do not always get what they want, or their way, and they live in a world, where other people need to be helped just like them. That way, when they grow up, they will not do something stupid, like putting their hand in the fire, or like maliciously hurting other people.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Monday, April 19, 2010
Point Three, Should An Adopted Child Be Returned?
Hello World:
Before I continue on this adoption series, I did not plan on this series, and had several other posts lined up ready to go. So, I kind of squeezed this adoption series in at the last minute, before other scheduled posts. I want to mention, that I do have a series ready and coming up discussing factors of why men cheat on their wives. I have some other good things already ready to publish, so stay tuned.
Back to the series at hand here, I was pointing out in the last post, that an investigator was asking the boy if he was hit by the mother or anyone in that American family. Again, like they are trying to criminalize that American family, or find something to criminalize them.
Also again, the boy had a hitlist out on the family. Now I believe that America probably has better living conditions than Russia. I do not believe that boy had a video game of his own in his orphanage. Maybe he did, but I do not believe that the average Russian citizen is as privileged as the average America citizen, and certainly no Russian orphan. Elsewise, he would not be up for adoption.
The idea for adopting a child, is to give them a better life and a better home, and to give them love. So, you mean to tell me this 7 year old terrorist left his orphaned conditions in Russia to go to, what appears to be a better place in America; with these people in America; who took the time and energy to go to Russia to get him, and want to care for him, and he acted a fool and makes a hitlist out on those same Americans trying to care for him?
In turn, people want to be angry and try to find something wrong with those Americans? The investigators want to pet that little boy. Let me make another point, that is you do not pet a demon. You know, while the investigator interviews that boy, the demon or demons inside that little boy can act dormant.
Some of these investigators and family service people need to personally try to take care of some of these problem children in their own home with their family. Then they will see how it feels when a child puts a hitlist out on their family.
Several more things, it appears the only thing the women or family did wrong, was, again, the procedures they followed in sending the boy back to Russia, NOT sending the boy back to Russia in itself. Again, the boy at age 7, is being controlled by the devil.
Another thing, the women or that family in America need to have a man in the house who can set the children in line. Women are not always as good at handling rebellious, out of control boys. A man has the PRESENCE and POWER to intimidate, beat some behinds, and knock some heads causing pain that will enforce discipline, way much more than a woman.
That is why I questioned if there is a man in that family. Now, with that, you do not want to beat or abuse the child, to the point where they have severe or lasting health problems. You want them to feel pain, temporarily, that will continue as long as they continue to act up. At times they may suffer physical bruising.
The whole point of beating, hitting and spanking is for it to be measured, and for the child to suffer something, so the child knows what they are doing is wrong. As an example, if you stick your hand in the fire, you will get burned. After you get burned, if you have any sense, you will not stick your hand back in the fire. The fire is not going to be kind to you, and you learned sticking your hand in fire is something you should not be doing. I have to come back with point four on this adoption.
Before I continue on this adoption series, I did not plan on this series, and had several other posts lined up ready to go. So, I kind of squeezed this adoption series in at the last minute, before other scheduled posts. I want to mention, that I do have a series ready and coming up discussing factors of why men cheat on their wives. I have some other good things already ready to publish, so stay tuned.
Back to the series at hand here, I was pointing out in the last post, that an investigator was asking the boy if he was hit by the mother or anyone in that American family. Again, like they are trying to criminalize that American family, or find something to criminalize them.
Also again, the boy had a hitlist out on the family. Now I believe that America probably has better living conditions than Russia. I do not believe that boy had a video game of his own in his orphanage. Maybe he did, but I do not believe that the average Russian citizen is as privileged as the average America citizen, and certainly no Russian orphan. Elsewise, he would not be up for adoption.
The idea for adopting a child, is to give them a better life and a better home, and to give them love. So, you mean to tell me this 7 year old terrorist left his orphaned conditions in Russia to go to, what appears to be a better place in America; with these people in America; who took the time and energy to go to Russia to get him, and want to care for him, and he acted a fool and makes a hitlist out on those same Americans trying to care for him?
In turn, people want to be angry and try to find something wrong with those Americans? The investigators want to pet that little boy. Let me make another point, that is you do not pet a demon. You know, while the investigator interviews that boy, the demon or demons inside that little boy can act dormant.
Some of these investigators and family service people need to personally try to take care of some of these problem children in their own home with their family. Then they will see how it feels when a child puts a hitlist out on their family.
Several more things, it appears the only thing the women or family did wrong, was, again, the procedures they followed in sending the boy back to Russia, NOT sending the boy back to Russia in itself. Again, the boy at age 7, is being controlled by the devil.
Another thing, the women or that family in America need to have a man in the house who can set the children in line. Women are not always as good at handling rebellious, out of control boys. A man has the PRESENCE and POWER to intimidate, beat some behinds, and knock some heads causing pain that will enforce discipline, way much more than a woman.
That is why I questioned if there is a man in that family. Now, with that, you do not want to beat or abuse the child, to the point where they have severe or lasting health problems. You want them to feel pain, temporarily, that will continue as long as they continue to act up. At times they may suffer physical bruising.
The whole point of beating, hitting and spanking is for it to be measured, and for the child to suffer something, so the child knows what they are doing is wrong. As an example, if you stick your hand in the fire, you will get burned. After you get burned, if you have any sense, you will not stick your hand back in the fire. The fire is not going to be kind to you, and you learned sticking your hand in fire is something you should not be doing. I have to come back with point four on this adoption.
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Point Two, Should An Adopted Child Be Returned?
Hello World:
This is the second point or post that I am continuing from post-point one. Again, this is about the story of the mother and grandmother who sent the child they adopted from Russia back to Russia. People are angry, the media and family service organizations want to feast on this. So, here I am being led by God to discuss this.
Remember I referenced two archive posts, in "Point One", previously, concerning this subject. What I want to do now is reference again some scriptures from one of those archive post.
Scripture Reference Proverbs Chapter 23: Verse 13; "Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die."
Verse 14; "Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell."
Okay I will come back to why I mentioned those scriptures in a moment. I also want to discuss the importance of having an adult man in the home. However, so far, from looking at this ongoing story of reversing the adoption, which has been seen as an international incident, I can only find one thing that the mother and the grandmother did that was wrong in this situation.
When I say wrong, I mean that God would see it as wrong, or would not approve. That being that the mother and/or grandmother should have personally escorted the boy by plane back to Russia to the adoption or orphanage, or had a adult person, that they knew to be trusting in that situation to escort the boy from their house to the airport, on the plane to Russia, into a taxi, back to the adoption agency or orphanage.
In other words, do not leave the boy in the hands of strangers or the airline stewardess. Now, in saying that, that is the only thing I can see that was not right. The overall fact that they could not handle the boy and sent him back to Russia was NOT wrong.
In my archive posts, I talked about unruly children and teenagers. Even though that boy was only 7 years old, he sill was a problem child, and is a GROWING problem child. From what I read, that 7 year old boy has a history of violence, and had set some building or something in Russia on fire purposely.
Again, do not take these as exact quotes, but accordng to the grandmother, the 7 year old exhibited violent and psychotic behavior. He had violent tendencies and had to be watched at ALL times. The child had a hitlist of people he was targeting. On the hitlist was the daughter or mother that he wanted to kill to take over the house. He wanted to kill the grandson for a video game. When the boy did not get what he wanted he wanted to go crazy.
What the Lord is showing me in all of this, is that those women where lied to, and adopted a demon possessed, 7 year old terrorist. The devil really got a hold of that child.
I noticed that people are so angry at the women, and the media are showing an interview with the boy, and one of the first questions to him, is did they hit him? That seems to always be the number one question. Let me say that even though the boy says he was not hit, he should have been hit. I will go into that shortly.
So, now there is an investigation into whether there was child abuse with the boy. So, it looks like law enforcements are trying to conjure up or create some criminal activity, where there may not have been.
Another thing, that gets on my nerve is the use or calling the women's or family's home a "compound". Why is it that every time someone is being investigated they are living in a compound. I think that is a STUPID choice of words. It makes the people look like extreme antigovernment hating armed militias or something. That is just stupid. Why not just say they are in or not in their home or apartment, trying to mind their own business!!! This post is running 5 pages on my preview browser, and I am not finished, so I must return God willing.
This is the second point or post that I am continuing from post-point one. Again, this is about the story of the mother and grandmother who sent the child they adopted from Russia back to Russia. People are angry, the media and family service organizations want to feast on this. So, here I am being led by God to discuss this.
Remember I referenced two archive posts, in "Point One", previously, concerning this subject. What I want to do now is reference again some scriptures from one of those archive post.
Scripture Reference Proverbs Chapter 23: Verse 13; "Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die."
Verse 14; "Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell."
Okay I will come back to why I mentioned those scriptures in a moment. I also want to discuss the importance of having an adult man in the home. However, so far, from looking at this ongoing story of reversing the adoption, which has been seen as an international incident, I can only find one thing that the mother and the grandmother did that was wrong in this situation.
When I say wrong, I mean that God would see it as wrong, or would not approve. That being that the mother and/or grandmother should have personally escorted the boy by plane back to Russia to the adoption or orphanage, or had a adult person, that they knew to be trusting in that situation to escort the boy from their house to the airport, on the plane to Russia, into a taxi, back to the adoption agency or orphanage.
In other words, do not leave the boy in the hands of strangers or the airline stewardess. Now, in saying that, that is the only thing I can see that was not right. The overall fact that they could not handle the boy and sent him back to Russia was NOT wrong.
In my archive posts, I talked about unruly children and teenagers. Even though that boy was only 7 years old, he sill was a problem child, and is a GROWING problem child. From what I read, that 7 year old boy has a history of violence, and had set some building or something in Russia on fire purposely.
Again, do not take these as exact quotes, but accordng to the grandmother, the 7 year old exhibited violent and psychotic behavior. He had violent tendencies and had to be watched at ALL times. The child had a hitlist of people he was targeting. On the hitlist was the daughter or mother that he wanted to kill to take over the house. He wanted to kill the grandson for a video game. When the boy did not get what he wanted he wanted to go crazy.
What the Lord is showing me in all of this, is that those women where lied to, and adopted a demon possessed, 7 year old terrorist. The devil really got a hold of that child.
I noticed that people are so angry at the women, and the media are showing an interview with the boy, and one of the first questions to him, is did they hit him? That seems to always be the number one question. Let me say that even though the boy says he was not hit, he should have been hit. I will go into that shortly.
So, now there is an investigation into whether there was child abuse with the boy. So, it looks like law enforcements are trying to conjure up or create some criminal activity, where there may not have been.
Another thing, that gets on my nerve is the use or calling the women's or family's home a "compound". Why is it that every time someone is being investigated they are living in a compound. I think that is a STUPID choice of words. It makes the people look like extreme antigovernment hating armed militias or something. That is just stupid. Why not just say they are in or not in their home or apartment, trying to mind their own business!!! This post is running 5 pages on my preview browser, and I am not finished, so I must return God willing.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Point One, Should An Adopted Child Be Returned?
Hello World:
This post is in response to the American women who adopted a 7 year old Russian boy, but has sent the boy back to the adoption agency in Russia. The information I am mentioning here is from several reports, and I want to add specifically that I read an article from CNN, about details of the boys behavior that I will paraphrase, but not quote in this post.
Many people are outraged at the American family for sending that 7 year old boy back to Russia from America alone. These are the reports I heard and read about. Now, from what I gather, people are very angry at two things done by the family. It appears that people are angry at the family for sending the adopted 7 year old back to Russia alone; AND ALSO, for sending him back period. It seems implied to me that people are angry that he was sent back in any circumstance.
This situation is still being looked into by the U.S. government and the Russian government, along with family services organizations and legal experts. Also, it appears that there is an American mother and grandmother who went to Russia and adopted the boy and who in agreeance together sent the boy back. So, after hearing and reading about this story, I felt led of the Lord to talk about this.
A couple of things I want to point out, is that this story is still onging. Also, even though the American women, mother and grandmother have not been charged with a crime, they still might be charged under a law somewhere. Even if they are charged with breaking a law, and punished, and that is, if, that does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong.
They still could have done something wrong, whether they are charged with something or not. I am just saying that, because a law or laws made by man do NOT necessarily fall in agreeance with God's laws or God's way of handling things.
So, for everybody, just because you break the law, or did something illegal, does not mean that you committed wrongdoing or sinned in God's eyes. Many times it could mean that, but sometimes it does not. Another way of saying it, is being legal does not necessarily mean being Godly; or obeying the law or pleasing society and advocacy groups does not always mean that you are pleasing God.
People have to know what God wants, what is the laws of society, and then seek God as to how we should do things. One more thing in the reports, and from what I heard, I have not seen anywhere, where there is a husband with the mother and grandmother stepping forth. Maybe there is a man in their home, who is the father of the other children there; I just did not see that in this story. It is important, whether or not there is a husband or man in the house to lead the family.
Now I am coming up on some points as led of the Lord. First, I ask everybody to in conjunction with reading this post, to refer back to two of my archive post. Please refer to the post titled; "Tattoos, Parents, Teenagers Morality Follow-Up posted back on Saturday, March 29th, 2008. Also, please look at the post; "Train Up A Child In The World We Live In Part 7", posted on April 13, 2007.
So far, I still have not said one way or the other if the mother and grandmother really did anything wrong. I do not mean to tease people as to what God has shown me. I thought I could mention everything all in this one post. I am going to have to continue in the next post. If there is is a slight indication of where I am going with this, readers can kind of see my direction from God by me referencing those archive posts above. Even in that, that is not all of the story, so I will be back.
This post is in response to the American women who adopted a 7 year old Russian boy, but has sent the boy back to the adoption agency in Russia. The information I am mentioning here is from several reports, and I want to add specifically that I read an article from CNN, about details of the boys behavior that I will paraphrase, but not quote in this post.
Many people are outraged at the American family for sending that 7 year old boy back to Russia from America alone. These are the reports I heard and read about. Now, from what I gather, people are very angry at two things done by the family. It appears that people are angry at the family for sending the adopted 7 year old back to Russia alone; AND ALSO, for sending him back period. It seems implied to me that people are angry that he was sent back in any circumstance.
This situation is still being looked into by the U.S. government and the Russian government, along with family services organizations and legal experts. Also, it appears that there is an American mother and grandmother who went to Russia and adopted the boy and who in agreeance together sent the boy back. So, after hearing and reading about this story, I felt led of the Lord to talk about this.
A couple of things I want to point out, is that this story is still onging. Also, even though the American women, mother and grandmother have not been charged with a crime, they still might be charged under a law somewhere. Even if they are charged with breaking a law, and punished, and that is, if, that does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong.
They still could have done something wrong, whether they are charged with something or not. I am just saying that, because a law or laws made by man do NOT necessarily fall in agreeance with God's laws or God's way of handling things.
So, for everybody, just because you break the law, or did something illegal, does not mean that you committed wrongdoing or sinned in God's eyes. Many times it could mean that, but sometimes it does not. Another way of saying it, is being legal does not necessarily mean being Godly; or obeying the law or pleasing society and advocacy groups does not always mean that you are pleasing God.
People have to know what God wants, what is the laws of society, and then seek God as to how we should do things. One more thing in the reports, and from what I heard, I have not seen anywhere, where there is a husband with the mother and grandmother stepping forth. Maybe there is a man in their home, who is the father of the other children there; I just did not see that in this story. It is important, whether or not there is a husband or man in the house to lead the family.
Now I am coming up on some points as led of the Lord. First, I ask everybody to in conjunction with reading this post, to refer back to two of my archive post. Please refer to the post titled; "Tattoos, Parents, Teenagers Morality Follow-Up posted back on Saturday, March 29th, 2008. Also, please look at the post; "Train Up A Child In The World We Live In Part 7", posted on April 13, 2007.
So far, I still have not said one way or the other if the mother and grandmother really did anything wrong. I do not mean to tease people as to what God has shown me. I thought I could mention everything all in this one post. I am going to have to continue in the next post. If there is is a slight indication of where I am going with this, readers can kind of see my direction from God by me referencing those archive posts above. Even in that, that is not all of the story, so I will be back.
Monday, April 12, 2010
God's Wrath And Judgement
Hello World:
This post is in relation to the earthquake situation in Haiti. As I mentioned several posts ago concerning the earthquake that hit Haiti, there is a famous preacher or minister in the United States who made some comments about that specific earthquake in Haiti. I am going to touch a little bit on God's wrath and judgement, here, and maybe down the road I may talk more about them in another post.
I am not going to quote the preacher, but he mentioned, something to the affect, that the people of Haiti are suffering because of a 200 year pact or agreement they made with the devil. It sounded like, and many people picked up that, he was implying that God's wrath and judgement struck the people of Haiti, or that the suffering was the Haitians own fault for aligning with the enemy of God.
So, that preacher or minister's comments reached the secular media, and it was broadcast to a wider audience. When that happened this well-known minister who has an organization and links to organizations who help the poor took back his comments by saying the earthquake was not of God. Again, not quoting him.
I am familiar with who this minister is, and I do not agree with him on everything. However, I do not think he should have took back his original comments concerning God's judgement on Haiti. I do think he told the truth.
I want to go more into possible judgements or punishments of God, and I want to say possible, because I do not know for sure. I do know how God operates in certain circumstances where there is wickedness. However, I want to do a quick or brief description of Haiti's history and its' people.
Firstly, that country used to be populated by Indians. One main group there was the Arawaks. I want to edit something in here concerning my research. I originally said, from my research, but not from God, but emphasizing FROM MY RESEARCH, that the Arawaks were cannibals. However, I have researched other reports that say the Arawaks were not cannibals. Several reports point to another group of Indians called the Caribs, who were also natives in Haiti as being the cannibals.
In my research, some reports actually place the Caribs and Arawaks as one group. Again however, there are other reports that suggest they were actually two seperate groups of Indians native to Haiti. The Arawaks were considered the peaceful group, while the Caribs were considered the more warlike and cannibalistic.
So, because of the conflicting reports, I do not want to fully put the canniblistic tag on the Arawaks here. I do believe there were a group of cannibals down there at that time; but I also believe there were some peaceful Indians, possibly being the Arawaks, who were minding there own business, but who suffered unjustly at the hands of White imperialists.
By the way, the definition of a cannibal is one who eats the flesh of its own, or when one human eats another human; which is of the devil and NOT of God. Various punishments of God for that type of vile, twisted and wicked behavior, I may discuss at a later time. In relation to those groups of Indians being native to Haiti, seperately, there originally were NO Black Africans in that land.
First the Spanish and then the French came and used force to kill most of the indians, while other indians died of diseases from those White European colonist. In conjunction with that, the White European colonist dragged Blacks over from Africa to serve as slaves for their causes of expanding their Spanish and French empires and robbing the country of Haiti of its' natural resources.
In time, there was a rebellion in Haiti among the slaves. The rebellion was led by a leader and priest who served in the satanic or devil practice of voodoo. Basically, the people of Haiti made a choice between TWO evils; White imperialism and slavery or voodoo leadership. They chose voodoo leadership. At that time there was no one who knew how to show and teach the Haitian people the right way to God through Jesus Christ. Henceforward, wickedness set in.
Now, there is the possibility that the earthquake could be of God. Again, I do not know for sure. However, I have deduced to four possibilities, two of which could be of God. God could actually have caused the earthquake to purge the land down there from wickedness and wicked people.
There are people down there, like my group who are promoting the right way to God or the gospel of Jesus Christ and they are safe. So, there could be, again, a purging taking place. Also, the other reason could be that God wants to wake up people around the world, or get people's attention to the suffering of the Haitian people and to help them.
The other reasons are seperate from God, and I will omit at this time, because I wanted to focus here on the real possibility of that being from God and WHY. There is a FALSE notion out there that God only loves or is love and does not harm or kill people or order others to kill.
God is a God of love and mercy, but He is also a God of wrath and judgement. Now, the devil or God's enemy, the adversary of God steals, kills and destroys also. God does not steal, but He kills and destroys wicked people. Throughout the Bible God obliterated or terminated wickedness. Mostly throughout the Old Testament, also with Ananias and Sapphira in the New Testament book of Acts and in the book of Revelation.
Many Christians who do not know their Bibles and other people want to be in denial of that fact. Now, I want to make it clear, that God does not kill just anybody for no good reasons, or because He can. He kills wickedness or rebellion against Him or those who perpetuate wickedness or rebellion against Him, not against man.
God is serious and is no joke. He does not play games and will eliminate fools. Again, there is precedent of this in the Bible. If someone is concerned that God might kill them, if you fear Him and be obedient to Him and follow Jesus and live righteously you do not have to worry. It is also God's will that none should perish(St John 3:16), but many do because they choose there own way or another way and not God's way and be against God.
This post is in relation to the earthquake situation in Haiti. As I mentioned several posts ago concerning the earthquake that hit Haiti, there is a famous preacher or minister in the United States who made some comments about that specific earthquake in Haiti. I am going to touch a little bit on God's wrath and judgement, here, and maybe down the road I may talk more about them in another post.
I am not going to quote the preacher, but he mentioned, something to the affect, that the people of Haiti are suffering because of a 200 year pact or agreement they made with the devil. It sounded like, and many people picked up that, he was implying that God's wrath and judgement struck the people of Haiti, or that the suffering was the Haitians own fault for aligning with the enemy of God.
So, that preacher or minister's comments reached the secular media, and it was broadcast to a wider audience. When that happened this well-known minister who has an organization and links to organizations who help the poor took back his comments by saying the earthquake was not of God. Again, not quoting him.
I am familiar with who this minister is, and I do not agree with him on everything. However, I do not think he should have took back his original comments concerning God's judgement on Haiti. I do think he told the truth.
I want to go more into possible judgements or punishments of God, and I want to say possible, because I do not know for sure. I do know how God operates in certain circumstances where there is wickedness. However, I want to do a quick or brief description of Haiti's history and its' people.
Firstly, that country used to be populated by Indians. One main group there was the Arawaks. I want to edit something in here concerning my research. I originally said, from my research, but not from God, but emphasizing FROM MY RESEARCH, that the Arawaks were cannibals. However, I have researched other reports that say the Arawaks were not cannibals. Several reports point to another group of Indians called the Caribs, who were also natives in Haiti as being the cannibals.
In my research, some reports actually place the Caribs and Arawaks as one group. Again however, there are other reports that suggest they were actually two seperate groups of Indians native to Haiti. The Arawaks were considered the peaceful group, while the Caribs were considered the more warlike and cannibalistic.
So, because of the conflicting reports, I do not want to fully put the canniblistic tag on the Arawaks here. I do believe there were a group of cannibals down there at that time; but I also believe there were some peaceful Indians, possibly being the Arawaks, who were minding there own business, but who suffered unjustly at the hands of White imperialists.
By the way, the definition of a cannibal is one who eats the flesh of its own, or when one human eats another human; which is of the devil and NOT of God. Various punishments of God for that type of vile, twisted and wicked behavior, I may discuss at a later time. In relation to those groups of Indians being native to Haiti, seperately, there originally were NO Black Africans in that land.
First the Spanish and then the French came and used force to kill most of the indians, while other indians died of diseases from those White European colonist. In conjunction with that, the White European colonist dragged Blacks over from Africa to serve as slaves for their causes of expanding their Spanish and French empires and robbing the country of Haiti of its' natural resources.
In time, there was a rebellion in Haiti among the slaves. The rebellion was led by a leader and priest who served in the satanic or devil practice of voodoo. Basically, the people of Haiti made a choice between TWO evils; White imperialism and slavery or voodoo leadership. They chose voodoo leadership. At that time there was no one who knew how to show and teach the Haitian people the right way to God through Jesus Christ. Henceforward, wickedness set in.
Now, there is the possibility that the earthquake could be of God. Again, I do not know for sure. However, I have deduced to four possibilities, two of which could be of God. God could actually have caused the earthquake to purge the land down there from wickedness and wicked people.
There are people down there, like my group who are promoting the right way to God or the gospel of Jesus Christ and they are safe. So, there could be, again, a purging taking place. Also, the other reason could be that God wants to wake up people around the world, or get people's attention to the suffering of the Haitian people and to help them.
The other reasons are seperate from God, and I will omit at this time, because I wanted to focus here on the real possibility of that being from God and WHY. There is a FALSE notion out there that God only loves or is love and does not harm or kill people or order others to kill.
God is a God of love and mercy, but He is also a God of wrath and judgement. Now, the devil or God's enemy, the adversary of God steals, kills and destroys also. God does not steal, but He kills and destroys wicked people. Throughout the Bible God obliterated or terminated wickedness. Mostly throughout the Old Testament, also with Ananias and Sapphira in the New Testament book of Acts and in the book of Revelation.
Many Christians who do not know their Bibles and other people want to be in denial of that fact. Now, I want to make it clear, that God does not kill just anybody for no good reasons, or because He can. He kills wickedness or rebellion against Him or those who perpetuate wickedness or rebellion against Him, not against man.
God is serious and is no joke. He does not play games and will eliminate fools. Again, there is precedent of this in the Bible. If someone is concerned that God might kill them, if you fear Him and be obedient to Him and follow Jesus and live righteously you do not have to worry. It is also God's will that none should perish(St John 3:16), but many do because they choose there own way or another way and not God's way and be against God.
Monday, April 05, 2010
Health And Nutrition Segment 1, Introduction
Hello World:
I am now beginning to say several things about how to be healthy, prevent disease and eat right. This first post on health and nutrition is basically an introduction to future posts on this subject. I am going to title each post on health and nutrition as a segment of the whole series. Even though it will be a series, I will not always consecutively do post on this subject together like all my other series in the past.
What I would like to do with this subject is touch on a particular subtopic, then talk about something different as the weeks or months go by. However, each time inserting another segment here and there between other post topics. So, if you see Segment 1, then know that there, hopefully, will be a Segment 2 and 3, etc. They just will not, again, "always" be posted back to back.
That will give me better flexibility to immediately move to another topic if I feel the Lord leading me. I will be giving alot of advice on health and nutrition, but I want everybody to know that I am not a licensed doctor. I do consider myself to be a self-proclaimed doctor in some respects, but not recognized in any medical field.
Although I have a University degree in a seperate field different from health, over the years, I have done my own research into health and nutrition. I am not a health and nutrition perfectionist, but I am very big on the subject. I also have learned things from experience and I have asked God to show me things, which He has.
Another thing that I want to mention is that alot of what I will be saying on this subject will be more from a practical standpoint. I may be a little technical or strict in information at times, but I will try to keep it generally understandable.
Several things I will talk about, again from experience, I know work and have worked for me. Perhaps in the next segment I will generally go into a little of my health history. Also there is a very famous person I want to talk about in the next segment as well. I want to pause here, to leap into a different subject and then come back to this H&N topic.
I am now beginning to say several things about how to be healthy, prevent disease and eat right. This first post on health and nutrition is basically an introduction to future posts on this subject. I am going to title each post on health and nutrition as a segment of the whole series. Even though it will be a series, I will not always consecutively do post on this subject together like all my other series in the past.
What I would like to do with this subject is touch on a particular subtopic, then talk about something different as the weeks or months go by. However, each time inserting another segment here and there between other post topics. So, if you see Segment 1, then know that there, hopefully, will be a Segment 2 and 3, etc. They just will not, again, "always" be posted back to back.
That will give me better flexibility to immediately move to another topic if I feel the Lord leading me. I will be giving alot of advice on health and nutrition, but I want everybody to know that I am not a licensed doctor. I do consider myself to be a self-proclaimed doctor in some respects, but not recognized in any medical field.
Although I have a University degree in a seperate field different from health, over the years, I have done my own research into health and nutrition. I am not a health and nutrition perfectionist, but I am very big on the subject. I also have learned things from experience and I have asked God to show me things, which He has.
Another thing that I want to mention is that alot of what I will be saying on this subject will be more from a practical standpoint. I may be a little technical or strict in information at times, but I will try to keep it generally understandable.
Several things I will talk about, again from experience, I know work and have worked for me. Perhaps in the next segment I will generally go into a little of my health history. Also there is a very famous person I want to talk about in the next segment as well. I want to pause here, to leap into a different subject and then come back to this H&N topic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)