Hello World:
I am going to finish up here on Iran for the time being, although I leave open the opportunity to come back to the subject of Iran or any country. Last time I was discussing some of the actions and consequences of protesting. I mentioned that America, who has complained about Iran, has its own history of harsh treatment of protestors.
By the way, America, remember your farse of an election in the year 2000, handing the incompetent and dictator Bush the Presidency over Gore? Do not tell me if a large group of American citizens protested Bush's fraudulent win over Gore back in 2000, with bottles, bats, rocks, setting cars, stores and houses on fire; blocking streets, as well as entrances to the White House, other government buildings and military installations, that the American government will not forcibly and violently remove and slam in jail as many protestors as possible.
I do want to say this about Iran and its current government. I am NOT posting all of this because I support or am in love with the Iranian government and its leaders. I am NOT buddies with Ahmadinejad. I do think that he still can be talked to and that DIRECT diplomacy should be used first before war, invasion or sanctions. If western leaders had any sense and directly talked to Ahmadinejad in a room, face to face, maybe he might listen and see the light, and actually change.
Iran needs a new government, and there are many countries that need a new government. Really, the only true and righteous government will come through God and Jesus Christ. I, as I have mentioned before in other posts, do not agree with the Islamic religion, which rules Iran. The people of Islam does NOT serve the same God or true God that Christians serve.
I want everybody all over the world to understand, that before this post and at the time of this post and most likely afterwards, that everybody or every religion does NOT serve the same God.
Continuing with the focus on Iran, women deserve to be treated better with more freedom and equality in Iran. The Ayatollah needs to be replaced, and he is no supreme leader. Yahweh, Jehovah, God is the Supreme Leader.
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Views On Iran Part IV
Hello World:
In expressing views concerning the country or people and government of Iran, I want to continue on the protesting that took place there after the June 2009 Presidential election.
If you are going to BOLDLY protest and DEFY the rule of your government, and try to initiate an overthrow of sorts, which is exactly what they were or are doing in Iran, then you have to be prepared for the worse to happen to you. You as DEFIANT citizens better have weapons, be prepared to use them, and be prepared to do real serious damage and death to your government. In DEFYING the government so BOLDLY and being so violent, like many Iranians did, you better have some miraculous resources to actually win, elsewise, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME.
In addition to that, you better be prepared to DIE, go to the hospital and be dragged and slammed in prison for a very long time, when you lose. Ultimately violent protest with weak resources, such as in Iran, does hardly nothing to solve the problem with any government in power.
Your government will not listen to you and change, because they have the army and have nearly all of the firepower. That means the government has the leverage, they make the rules, they win and you lose. Again, you either go to prison, the hospital or die because you are NOT powerful enough, but want attention.
The wiser thing to do is not be violent, and not be out there tearing up the country, in the first place, because you did not get your way. Every time you lose something, you do NOT have to tear up the country, or city or neighborhoods acting like a bunch of immature children. Tearing up the place just makes it worse for every other common citizen. The people of Iran are not the only country guilty of doing that. So, that speaks to other people in other countries as well.
If it is that bad, then try and leave the country for good. Another thing, sitting or chained, blocking streets, or impeding the progress of government activities and the business happenings of average citizens is not peaceful. I am not saying those things should never be done, because sometimes they may be necessary. I am just saying doing that is not exactly peaceful.
There have been peaceful protest and marches that were not harmful to other people trying to go about their own business. However, those actions can be, not always, but can be selfish; in that, such persons doing those actions are not thinking about what harm they may be causing, holding up the next person.
People, when you disagree with your government, you can always directly tell them by talking to them about it, by phone or by mailing in letters to your government letting them know you do not like what they are doing. A public spectacle is usually not necessary and, again, tearing up the place certainly is not necessary.
When you block areas and impede progress, and again I am not saying this part should never be done, but in doing that you are asking to be REMOVED WITH FORCE OR WITH VIOLENCE. Also, America and other western countries need to quit whinning about the way the Iranian protestors have been treated, because in America, they have a history of beating and water hosing protestors also. I will be back with part 5 on my views on Iran.
In expressing views concerning the country or people and government of Iran, I want to continue on the protesting that took place there after the June 2009 Presidential election.
If you are going to BOLDLY protest and DEFY the rule of your government, and try to initiate an overthrow of sorts, which is exactly what they were or are doing in Iran, then you have to be prepared for the worse to happen to you. You as DEFIANT citizens better have weapons, be prepared to use them, and be prepared to do real serious damage and death to your government. In DEFYING the government so BOLDLY and being so violent, like many Iranians did, you better have some miraculous resources to actually win, elsewise, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME.
In addition to that, you better be prepared to DIE, go to the hospital and be dragged and slammed in prison for a very long time, when you lose. Ultimately violent protest with weak resources, such as in Iran, does hardly nothing to solve the problem with any government in power.
Your government will not listen to you and change, because they have the army and have nearly all of the firepower. That means the government has the leverage, they make the rules, they win and you lose. Again, you either go to prison, the hospital or die because you are NOT powerful enough, but want attention.
The wiser thing to do is not be violent, and not be out there tearing up the country, in the first place, because you did not get your way. Every time you lose something, you do NOT have to tear up the country, or city or neighborhoods acting like a bunch of immature children. Tearing up the place just makes it worse for every other common citizen. The people of Iran are not the only country guilty of doing that. So, that speaks to other people in other countries as well.
If it is that bad, then try and leave the country for good. Another thing, sitting or chained, blocking streets, or impeding the progress of government activities and the business happenings of average citizens is not peaceful. I am not saying those things should never be done, because sometimes they may be necessary. I am just saying doing that is not exactly peaceful.
There have been peaceful protest and marches that were not harmful to other people trying to go about their own business. However, those actions can be, not always, but can be selfish; in that, such persons doing those actions are not thinking about what harm they may be causing, holding up the next person.
People, when you disagree with your government, you can always directly tell them by talking to them about it, by phone or by mailing in letters to your government letting them know you do not like what they are doing. A public spectacle is usually not necessary and, again, tearing up the place certainly is not necessary.
When you block areas and impede progress, and again I am not saying this part should never be done, but in doing that you are asking to be REMOVED WITH FORCE OR WITH VIOLENCE. Also, America and other western countries need to quit whinning about the way the Iranian protestors have been treated, because in America, they have a history of beating and water hosing protestors also. I will be back with part 5 on my views on Iran.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Views On Iran Part III
Hello World:
Getting back to Iran's past June 2009 election, I want to make several points. Many know that the Ayatollah Cleric holds the power of the country of Iran, and that Ahmadinejad is just a figure head. However, Ahmadinejad although he is not the most powerful in Iran, does have some power in leadership, is chosen to represent the ideas of the Ayatollah; and based upon his FIRST time being ELECTED back in 2005, and in the disputed election this 2009 time; where he appeared to have a super majority; he has his supporters among the average Iranian citizens.
Even, if the voting in this 2009 Iranian election was rigged and a fraud, just by the people protesting against him AND those rallying FOR him shows even in a case of POSSIBLE fraud, Ahmadinejad has about half of the PEOPLE of the country of Iran in support of him.
It does not appear that he has only a small room full of people or twenty-percent, but he appears to have a sizeable group of supporters. The western media do not want to show or tell that part of the election. They want to show the opposition more to make it seem like Ahmadinejad received hardly no votes, and he is overwhelmingly outnumbered by those who oppose him, but that is simply not true.
Speaking of the opposition, and the leader for change in Iran who emerged in the aftermath of the election. The man the media gives attention to, really was not the real face of change and opposition in Iran anyways. The real face of change and opposition in Iran should have been a woman.
Also, Ahmadinejad only has 4 more years, so it appears he will not be in power as President for life. Also, many people who were in opposition, who protested were NOT peaceful. Many of the protestors were violent tearing up the city of Tehran, making fires and throwing rocks.
Those protestors were not all standing there with their arms folded doing no harm like western media want to portray. Some were, but many people were causing chaos. I know and saw the young lady, or father's daughter who was shot in the chest and died in that protest. That was very sad and unnecessary for her, in particular, to get shot and killed.
However, I do not put all the blame on the Iranian government for her killing. People have to understand that the Iranian government has a job to do, and that is keep order in the streets and the country among its people; and in doing that among many people who are unruly, they can not blink or be shy about hurting somebody.
Some of the blame for the young lady's death goes to the protestors who were being violent and creating an atmosphere of chaos in the streets. Secondly, and I do not mean to sound insensitive, but the father and his daughter are partly to blame as well.
The reason being is this, if the father had any wisdom he would not have allowed him and his daughter to be standing out there in that kind of environment or situation. If it was the father's idea to go out there, she, the daughter, should have said no; and she may have, and might have been forced by her father to go with him. Either way, one or both of them should not have agreed to go into that kind of environment.
Even if you are peaceful, in a melee of rocks, bottles and bullets flying you are asking for trouble. As an example if I had a daughter, I would not be just standing there with my daughter if some police, army or group of people have weapons and are using them, because in that situation somebody is going to get hurt and killed; usually an innocent by-stander always gets it badly, and I do not want it to be me, my daughter or my friends.
Getting back to Iran's past June 2009 election, I want to make several points. Many know that the Ayatollah Cleric holds the power of the country of Iran, and that Ahmadinejad is just a figure head. However, Ahmadinejad although he is not the most powerful in Iran, does have some power in leadership, is chosen to represent the ideas of the Ayatollah; and based upon his FIRST time being ELECTED back in 2005, and in the disputed election this 2009 time; where he appeared to have a super majority; he has his supporters among the average Iranian citizens.
Even, if the voting in this 2009 Iranian election was rigged and a fraud, just by the people protesting against him AND those rallying FOR him shows even in a case of POSSIBLE fraud, Ahmadinejad has about half of the PEOPLE of the country of Iran in support of him.
It does not appear that he has only a small room full of people or twenty-percent, but he appears to have a sizeable group of supporters. The western media do not want to show or tell that part of the election. They want to show the opposition more to make it seem like Ahmadinejad received hardly no votes, and he is overwhelmingly outnumbered by those who oppose him, but that is simply not true.
Speaking of the opposition, and the leader for change in Iran who emerged in the aftermath of the election. The man the media gives attention to, really was not the real face of change and opposition in Iran anyways. The real face of change and opposition in Iran should have been a woman.
Also, Ahmadinejad only has 4 more years, so it appears he will not be in power as President for life. Also, many people who were in opposition, who protested were NOT peaceful. Many of the protestors were violent tearing up the city of Tehran, making fires and throwing rocks.
Those protestors were not all standing there with their arms folded doing no harm like western media want to portray. Some were, but many people were causing chaos. I know and saw the young lady, or father's daughter who was shot in the chest and died in that protest. That was very sad and unnecessary for her, in particular, to get shot and killed.
However, I do not put all the blame on the Iranian government for her killing. People have to understand that the Iranian government has a job to do, and that is keep order in the streets and the country among its people; and in doing that among many people who are unruly, they can not blink or be shy about hurting somebody.
Some of the blame for the young lady's death goes to the protestors who were being violent and creating an atmosphere of chaos in the streets. Secondly, and I do not mean to sound insensitive, but the father and his daughter are partly to blame as well.
The reason being is this, if the father had any wisdom he would not have allowed him and his daughter to be standing out there in that kind of environment or situation. If it was the father's idea to go out there, she, the daughter, should have said no; and she may have, and might have been forced by her father to go with him. Either way, one or both of them should not have agreed to go into that kind of environment.
Even if you are peaceful, in a melee of rocks, bottles and bullets flying you are asking for trouble. As an example if I had a daughter, I would not be just standing there with my daughter if some police, army or group of people have weapons and are using them, because in that situation somebody is going to get hurt and killed; usually an innocent by-stander always gets it badly, and I do not want it to be me, my daughter or my friends.
Saturday, November 07, 2009
Views On Iran Part II
Hello World:
Iran is close to having a civil war in the country. Iran has serious divisions among its leaders and its people. As most people know, back in June Ahmadinejad was re-elected as President of Iran. Many people in Iran and outside from western countries believe the vote result was a fraud. I will come back to that later on.
Last time I was discussing how Iran would fair if they went to war against Israel. Iran appears that they would not do well in that war from a casualty count. What I am saying here is based on analysis, and Iran could surprise some people and be stronger in that regard.
Also, again the government and people of the United States, Israel and other countries have no right to tell Iran or try to force Iran not to develop nuclear weapons. Should they have nuclear weapons? No, and neither should the United States, France, Israel, Russia, China or anybody else. The same things here, I am saying about Iran and nuclear weapons, also holds true for North Korea.
The only countries who truthfully should have a say in Iran not having nuclear weapons are countries who at this point absolutely do NOT have any of those kinds of weapons! Nuclear weapon free countries also have the right to tell the United States and other nuclear countries to get rid of their nuclear weapons once and for all.
Also, I need to mention in regards to conflicts between Iran and Israel, and supposed comments by Ahmadinejad. Ahmadinejad in an interview when asked if he spoke of Israel being wiped off the map, said NO!
Adding to this, is the fact that, western governments, evangelical preachers and media speak about that propaganda of him talking about destroying Israel and all Jews. However, I have researched from MULTIPLE documents, that say there are up to as many as 25,000 Jews living in Iran.
Jews have lived there for thousands of years, when Iran was known as Persia. So, if Ahmadinejad and the Ayatollah really wanted to kill all Jews, then why is it that 25,000 Jews are living in Iran today? You would think it would be easier for Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government and military to make Jews inside of of their own country of Iran to disappear first? Those 25,000 Jews, living in Iran, do not seem to be on the verge of being killed.
I also read another report where the Israeli government offered to pay Iranian or Persian Jews a substantial amount of money to leave Iran and move to Israel; and those Jews refused the offer and decided to stay in Iran. So, if Jews are in so much danger from Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government then why did they NOT leave Iran?
So, somewhere along that line someone is lying, and falsely trying to instigate hate and world war. If I am somewhere where I do not like my environment and I am in danger because someone wants to eliminate me by killing me and they are in power; and someone, CREDIBLE, comes along and OFFERS to PAY me to move somewhere else where I would be safe, I would most likely take that offer.
Iran is close to having a civil war in the country. Iran has serious divisions among its leaders and its people. As most people know, back in June Ahmadinejad was re-elected as President of Iran. Many people in Iran and outside from western countries believe the vote result was a fraud. I will come back to that later on.
Last time I was discussing how Iran would fair if they went to war against Israel. Iran appears that they would not do well in that war from a casualty count. What I am saying here is based on analysis, and Iran could surprise some people and be stronger in that regard.
Also, again the government and people of the United States, Israel and other countries have no right to tell Iran or try to force Iran not to develop nuclear weapons. Should they have nuclear weapons? No, and neither should the United States, France, Israel, Russia, China or anybody else. The same things here, I am saying about Iran and nuclear weapons, also holds true for North Korea.
The only countries who truthfully should have a say in Iran not having nuclear weapons are countries who at this point absolutely do NOT have any of those kinds of weapons! Nuclear weapon free countries also have the right to tell the United States and other nuclear countries to get rid of their nuclear weapons once and for all.
Also, I need to mention in regards to conflicts between Iran and Israel, and supposed comments by Ahmadinejad. Ahmadinejad in an interview when asked if he spoke of Israel being wiped off the map, said NO!
Adding to this, is the fact that, western governments, evangelical preachers and media speak about that propaganda of him talking about destroying Israel and all Jews. However, I have researched from MULTIPLE documents, that say there are up to as many as 25,000 Jews living in Iran.
Jews have lived there for thousands of years, when Iran was known as Persia. So, if Ahmadinejad and the Ayatollah really wanted to kill all Jews, then why is it that 25,000 Jews are living in Iran today? You would think it would be easier for Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government and military to make Jews inside of of their own country of Iran to disappear first? Those 25,000 Jews, living in Iran, do not seem to be on the verge of being killed.
I also read another report where the Israeli government offered to pay Iranian or Persian Jews a substantial amount of money to leave Iran and move to Israel; and those Jews refused the offer and decided to stay in Iran. So, if Jews are in so much danger from Ahmadinejad and the Iranian government then why did they NOT leave Iran?
So, somewhere along that line someone is lying, and falsely trying to instigate hate and world war. If I am somewhere where I do not like my environment and I am in danger because someone wants to eliminate me by killing me and they are in power; and someone, CREDIBLE, comes along and OFFERS to PAY me to move somewhere else where I would be safe, I would most likely take that offer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)