Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 15

Hello World:
I am still on the U.S. elections, continuing here on Sarah Palin and her political party being unjustly against the right to choose for women. This world is full of wicked people who prey on women, and women need to be able to fight back with choices about what to do with their own body after they have been sexually assaulted. I know that people have made exceptions to give birth and raise a child after being raped, and that is their choice; however, the seed of a rapist is NOT innocent and does NOT deserve to live.

I am not talking about a person who is growing up or who has grown to an adult and it is found that he or she is a product of rape, and they should be killed when found out; NO! I am talking about before they are born or coming out of the womb they should not be allowed to live; because that is NEVER God's plan for a woman to have a baby that way, by rape! The kind of spirit behind that is NOT of God, and so the resulting product should be terminated.

Conservative preachers can preach all they want about life upon conception, and scriptures on King David talking about God forming him in the womb, and choosing a prophet like Samuel, or judge like Sampson before they were born, and knowing great men and women before they were born. Of course God should know all of that and equip a specific one for service in the mother's womb, like John the Baptist; however, God has not chosen EVERY baby to be born to be great or do something great for Him!!!

What about a ungodly woman who sleeps around and has many children taxing the system; and then there are Godly, righteous women who are married and following the moral rules; but as hard as they try, can not get pregnant. I am in no wise blaming that on God, but my point is just because a woman got pregnant DOES NOT mean that God endorses that pregnancy.

Jesus said in St. Matthew Chapter 20: Verse 16; "So, the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called but few chosen."

St. John Chapter 13: Verse 18; Jesus said, "I speak NOT of you all: I KNOW WHOM I HAVE CHOSEN: ........."

2 Timothy Chapter 2: Verse 29; "Nevertheless, the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are HIs. And Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity."

So, from those scriptures, I say that God is very choicey. Again, He has not chosen every baby to be a king David or to be a Prophet Samuel, or to be born at all. Again, many babies are conceived and born out of the will of God or without God's endorsement!

Therefore an argument that is preached about God knowing a person before they are born; or choosing, SPECIFIC, persons in the womb over time, has nothing to do with the fact that there are babies born in wickedness, whos' MOTHERS THE DEVIL ASSAULTED to have them; who grow up to serve the devil, causing great harm to many, who are absolutely none of His(God).

Turning back to politics in general, politics can be nasty and unfair. Also, the Democratic party is not the greatest party. However, these days, and for several decades, they have been more in favor of the common people and overall better than Republicans. Sarah Palin, you at the time of me creating this post stand with a group, the Republicans who are against God and who are against women.

Sarah Palin, if you truly want to be on God's side, as I mentioned above, one of the things you need to stand for are policies that are FOR women, like a woman's right to choose, and quit supporting groups that do not have the best interest of women in mind.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 14

Hello World:
I am still focusing on Sarah Palin at this point in this election series. Sarah accepted that position of running for Vice President prematurally. Many of her responses were not intelligent, and what happened was she really made women, as a whole, look bad in terms of not being knowledgeable about her nation and the world.

I do not mean to make fun here, but on the surface she is a pretty woman, but inside she looked stupid, and again, that was a bad impression in representing women. I believe Sarah is intelligent, it is just that she did not look like it then.

That stage was bad timing for her; and perhaps many of us have been there, where we can do better, and maybe even know how, but wind up messing things up. We mess up because we did not prepare right, do not have the confidence, or just for unkown or other reasons had a bad day. In terms of representing women as the Vice-President, there are other beautiful and knowledgeable women out there who could have done a much better job.

Another thing, in an interview question about a view on the "Bush Foreign Policy", the best answer would have been that you disagree with it. That is even if you did not fully understand his policy; which at that point you should have known, about, who you and McCain, potentially, was going to succeed in office.

Even if you do not understand the policy or the question, you can say, look, I have my plan of foreign policy and how I will implement it. Basically, you do not have to know everything, or have all the answers, but you do need to have a plan.

Again, you can not just show up on national television, and not know anything about those holding office before you, and also not have your own plan with confidence. Know one or the other. In other words, know either his past plan, or know your future plan, or know both to be able to give some kind of intelligent explanation. That interview along with other ones were a disaster for her.

Next thing Sarah, as a woman or any woman, who truly live for the causes of women, you should not let anyone take away a woman's right to choose. Now, I am talking about being for Women's rights and causes, NOT against, but for. Being pro-life is lame and hypocritical when it is okay to go to some other country and kill leaders and innocent people in invasions and wars.

Abortion is the stopping or termination of any life, not just babies. Abortion is not the main problem anyways, but it is the causes or things that lead a woman to having an abortion; or what would cause her to make a justifiable choice in that regard.

Too many conservatives focus, fast, and have all these prayers to stop abortion, when what they really should be focusing on is stopping the causes that lead to a decision to have an abortion. It is not the abortion doctors fault or the abortion clinics fault that are set either. You first need to stop all rapes from happening.

Also, how about stopping ALL incest. In addition, why do you not stop and prevent ALL women's lives who will be in danger if they were to give birth. Another thing, stop ALL of the inhuman and unmanageable sufferings caused by birth defects.

So, until you can stop ALL of these atrocities and sufferings that women go through, that cause them to make the decision to go have an abortion, then you and all other supposed pro-lifers have no righteous or just case. Stop ALL of those problems of women wrongfully getting pregnant, and then you will not have to worry about the large numbers of abortions.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 13

Hello World:
Before I go on discussing Palin, I want to briefly change subjects to talk about Jesus' real birthday. Back in 2007, I mentioned in my Christmas post series that around the time of September 11th, 3 B.C. is the approximate real date of the birth of Jesus. There is alot of evidence, out there and within the Bible that shows that Jesus was NOT born in the month of December.

I do not want to repeat everything from that series, but as I mentioned before, someone else was born on December 25th, and that person was not Jesus. Another thing I want to point out about this, is that, Jesus' real birthday of September 11th, 3 B.C., from my research, is by using the current solar calendar, that many people throughout the world use today. If someone uses a Hebrew/Jewish Lunisolar calendar, it would show that Jesus birthday would fall AROUND the time of August 22.

So, the time frame, in terms of months for Jesus to have been born is between mid to late August and mid to late September. Again, using, specifically, the current solar calendar that many use today, including myself, the more accurate birthdate of Jesus Christ, again, is around September 11th, 3 B.C. timeframe, most likely right on to the day.

Picking up on Palin from last time, I am going to be really tough on her here. As I mentioned before about her good fashion sense, can we imagine if she was the President, how many people all over the world would watch her just because of her good looks. Never mind that she may not be making any sense in what she is saying.

Now I have to sort of disect Sarah Palin from a decision and policy making standpoint. Just a few months back, Sarah resigned as Governor of Alaska. There are many rumors as to why she did this. Some are saying that she is fed up with politics. Some are speculating that her political future and bid to be elected President in 2012 is over and dead.

Sarah does not seem too concerned about her political future success. I can almost say right now for sure, that she will not be elected as U.S. President in 2012. The way Obama is going so far, I do not believe anybody will stop him in 2012. At this point, Obama is on course for re-election. At the time of this post, the Republican party, to whom Sarah Palin still belongs to, at the moment has nobody who can compete with Barack Obama in 2012.

Interchangeably here and in the next several posts, I am, from time to time, going to address Sarah directly, and also as second person. For starters, I want to say to Sarah Palin or about Sarah Palin is that she made the wrong choice for starters in choosing to be a conservative Republican. I want to point out something, that it is okay to have some conservative views, but the American brand of Republican conservatism is too extremist and bad for people. Sarah, if you were smart, you would drop the Republican party like a bag of heavy bricks.

In fact, no women and this also includes Nikki Haley from South Carolina, if they were smart, would be a Republican. Nikki believe me when I say you are currently on the wrong side. The Republican party has policies that are heavily anti-women, racist, and anti-poor. The only group that the Republican party stands for are rich, White men. What I mean by rich, I mean by couples or families who make over $250,000 and singles who make over $100,000 in income, or around the top 30%(percent) of all people living in the U.S.

In addition to the above paragraph, I just have to mention some information from a outside reference. I retrieved some information on political party trends and values from a organization called the Pew Research Center. I want to provide the following quote from a page of how this organization describes itself. Pew says, "The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press is an independent, non-partisan public opinion research organization that studies attitudes toward politics, the press and public policy issues."

One of Pew's survey reports from May 21st, 2009 shows through their research that the Republican party in the U.S. is 88 percent White-Anglo, the same as in the year 2000. The Democratic party has changed from 64 percent White Anglo to 56 percent in eight years. Much of what I have been saying in this U.S. election series concerning race problems in America is highly confirmed by that Pew report.

The Democratic party shows more racial diversification whereas the Republican party does not. One should believe and conclude, from the above political party percentages that, the more racial or ethnic diversification in a party, the more concerns and actions FOR social and economic equality and fairness will be in a party for EVERY racial or ethnic group. The Republicans with their SUPER, SUPER majority (88%)make-up of Whites lack that needed diversification, concern and actions.

With that said above, the Republican party has members, who are non-white, women and people who work hourly jobs making $50,000 or less, who foolishly and ignorantly follow the party's causes. Many of these followers who work hourly do not even realize, that they support people like John McCain, who actually works against them, by him voting between 17 to 19 times against minimum, or hourly wage increases as I mentioned a few post back.

The Republican party of the U.S., and its leaders are NOT compassionate! They use alot of people that they do not care about helping. They do not care about helping the common man. They are concerned about having all the decision making power and all the riches, and will use whoever will foolishly and ignorantly let them.

Also, Sarah when John McCain came to you to join him as his running mate, you should have said NO, because you were not well versed in national or foreign policy. It is okay to say you do not want to do it. It is okay to say you are not ready.

If you were passionate about being a leader at that level, you should have just waited, not accepted McCain's offer and went to do your own study and gather more knowledge and experience about the world before going on that stage.

Analysis Of The 2008 U.S. Elections Part 12

Hello World:
I want to focus alot of this post on Sarah Palin. I am going to be at times brutally honest here. I am always honest, but I am going to be more brutal and I feel that it is needed here. It would be good if America did have a woman president, as long as the woman is not a conservative Republican.

Now I have to compare Hillary Clinton to Sarah Palin a little. Between the two women, I believe that Hillary Clinton would make the better President, while Palin would look prettier. Now, I do not agree with everything about both of these women. I think though that Hillary is more knowledgeable about public policy and would be better at development and planning of policies, and I believe Hillary's policies would actually help more people in need than Palin's policies.

In the next several paragraphs, I am going to briefly give my impressions of Hillary and Sarah, based on their appearance. In the previous post, I talked about Hillary being, in some ways conservative concerning some of her foreign policy engagement. However, the good thing is that she does NOT hold to ALL of the ideas of conservative Republicans.

Hillary is also conservative in how she carries herself and how she dresses. Hillary's movements and mannerisms appears stiff and politically scripted. In other words, it is as if someone coached her to behave a certain way to please the political establishment, and she is not really free in expression.

It is okay to be coached, and I am sure Palin had alot of coaching and others are coached as well; but it is not good when you can not freely express yourself. In addition, Hillary's appearance in how she dresses looks to be scripted from someone else. Hillary dresses like one of the boys, or lets say, one of the boys from Washington so to speak. Pants suits are so NOT feminine. Pants suits is being one of the guys, to prove to everyone that you are equal with the men.

To go with the pants suits, is the short hair cut look that Hillary has. That is a compromise to give up femininity to, again, please the political establishment. A woman can still be a woman and lead without looking or dressing like one of the boys. Hillary Clinton is NOT good at that, and Sarah Palin IS.

Sarah Palin gets the best dress award out of all the mentioned persons in this series so far. Sarah, although she is a conservative in policy decisions, does not dress conservative. Hillary on the other hand, appears more covered up from neck to toes, short hair cut, conservative, dull and dry and predictable in expression. Those are some of my impressions from Hillary and Sarah's appearance.

Now, a problem with Palin is that her Republican party paid $150,000 for her wardrobe in reports. Sarah Palin knows how to dress like a woman, and her husband should be glad of that, but a woman does not have to buy expensive clothing to look beautiful, sexy or like they are on the high-end of the monetary society.

To all woman, you do not have to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to look good like Sarah Palin. I think Sarah knows this too, but I think she was just going with the flow and not challenging her advisors. Women, you can look very good, or excellent and spend less.

Now, I do not want to ever complain about a woman looking good, but I do want to say that a woman needs to keep things in persepective and be smart about spending money. Clothes similiar to what Palin was wearing during the campaign, can probably be purchased ranging in prices between $5,000 to $13,000; leaving the remaining $137,000 to $145,000 spent by Palin's Republican party to go to important social causes. However, this is a major problem with the Republicans; is that they do not think like that.

Those above figures for purchasing clothes, I gathered from looking at some clothes and prices from various stores in different parts of the world, and calculating the number of different outfits needed to be worn, with shoes, for a certain number of days. It would appear that a wardrobe or set of clothes, such as what Palin was wearing, does NOT NEED to cost anywhere near $150,000.

Again, Palin looked good, and she dresses like a woman supposed to dress, from EVERY article of clothing. She also has the right hair length too. Women, long hair is always a plus. That is surprising to me about Palin, because she appeared to be very tom-boyish growing up with her basketball days. However, Palin learned how to be woman.

Being feminine is lost with alot women nowadays. Femininity or being feminine is an art. It should be natural for women, but women lose it growing up in a masculine or male, stress-led society and from getting bad advise. In many places, too many women dress and look like a dude. Societies have become a collective masculine hive, where almost everybody looks the same, on behalf of political correctness.

So, women and young ladies growing up, if you want to know or learn how to dress like a woman should, Sarah Palin is a good example for you to learn from. Later though, I am going to rip into Sarah, from a policy standpoint, in the next post. However, from a women's fashion sense, that is a big plus or good thing about Sarah Palin.

Now, which is more important policy or good looks? Well, policy is more important, but for women, do not compromise away from what should be natural.